Galactic Encounters, The Flying Banana & the Fate of Andromeda
Space Nuts: Exploring the CosmosJune 13, 2025
529
00:34:2731.59 MB

Galactic Encounters, The Flying Banana & the Fate of Andromeda

Sponsor Details:
This episode is brought to you by Saily...your passport to seamless global connectivity. Get your special Space Nuts offer from Saily by visiting www.saily.com/spacenuts for a great discount price and a 30-day money-back guarantee. 

Collision Course? And the Mysteries of the Aurora
In this captivating episode of Space Nuts, hosts Heidi Campo and Professor Fred Watson delve into a range of astronomical topics that illuminate our understanding of the universe. From the latest findings regarding the fate of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies to the enchanting phenomena of auroras, this episode is sure to spark your cosmic curiosity.
Episode Highlights:
Milky Way and Andromeda Collision: The episode kicks off with an exciting update on the potential collision between our galaxy and Andromeda. Fred discusses new research suggesting that gravitational influences from nearby galaxies may alter the predicted course of this cosmic encounter, making the odds of a disastrous collision lower than previously thought.
Understanding Fiducial Models: Heidi and Fred explore the concept of fiducial models in astronomical predictions, clarifying their role in understanding complex orbital dynamics and the challenges of measuring motion across vast cosmic distances.
The Flying Banana and Aurora Chasers: The duo transitions to a whimsical story about a laser-emitting train dubbed the "Flying Banana," which inadvertently confused aurora hunters with its blue light. Fred shares insights into the aurora borealis and the technology used to monitor and study these stunning natural displays.
Japanese Moon Mission Setback: The episode also covers the recent setback of the Japanese lunar lander mission, highlighting the challenges faced by space exploration endeavors and the lessons learned from failures.
Mars Odyssey's Stunning Views: Lastly, Fred discusses the Mars Odyssey orbiter's recent capture of breathtaking images of Martian volcanoes peeking above morning clouds, showcasing the ongoing exploration and discoveries being made on the Red Planet.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
(00:00) Welcome to Space Nuts with Heidi Campo and Fred Watson
(01:20) Discussion on the Milky Way and Andromeda collision predictions
(15:00) Exploring fiducial models in astronomy
(25:30) The Flying Banana and aurora phenomena
(35:00) Japanese moon mission failure and its implications
(45:00) Mars Odyssey's stunning volcanic views
For commercial-free versions of Space Nuts, join us on Patreon, Supercast, Apple Podcasts, or become a supporter here: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support


00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Heidi Campo: And blast off. We are

00:00:03 --> 00:00:05 launch. We are go for launch on another

00:00:05 --> 00:00:08 amazing out of this world episode of space

00:00:08 --> 00:00:08 nuts.

00:00:08 --> 00:00:11 Voice Over Guy: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 10, 9. Ignition

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 sequence start. Space nuts. 5, 4, 3,

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20 2. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,

00:00:20 --> 00:00:23 3, 2, 1. Space nuts. Astronauts

00:00:23 --> 00:00:24 report it feels good.

00:00:24 --> 00:00:27 Heidi Campo: I am your host for this lovely

00:00:27 --> 00:00:30 evening. For me morning for Fred your host,

00:00:30 --> 00:00:33 Heidi Campo. And joining us is

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35 Professor Fred Watson, astronomer at large.

00:00:36 --> 00:00:38 Professor Fred Watson: Hey, Fred, how are you doing? Heidi,

00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 it's great to see you after our

00:00:42 --> 00:00:43 trepidations yesterday.

00:00:45 --> 00:00:48 Heidi Campo: We are coming to you on schedule, but we

00:00:48 --> 00:00:51 are a day late. But the stories

00:00:51 --> 00:00:53 are still the same high quality you can

00:00:53 --> 00:00:54 expect.

00:00:54 --> 00:00:54 Professor Fred Watson: That's right.

00:00:55 --> 00:00:57 Heidi Campo: we had a little bit of troubleshooting to do,

00:00:57 --> 00:01:00 but just like, the folks over at NASA,

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02 failure for getting this episode out was not

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05 an option. And we put our brains

00:01:05 --> 00:01:06 together and figured it out.

00:01:06 --> 00:01:08 Professor Fred Watson: So I think you did most of the brain work

00:01:08 --> 00:01:11 there, Heidi. I don't think I qualify as

00:01:11 --> 00:01:13 being included in that. I just, watched the

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15 magic happen when you finally appeared on my

00:01:15 --> 00:01:16 screen, which was good.

00:01:17 --> 00:01:19 Heidi Campo: Half of it was luck. I think I just clicked

00:01:19 --> 00:01:20 on the right buttons in the right order.

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24 but speaking of luck and a little bit of

00:01:24 --> 00:01:27 magic, it looks like our first story this

00:01:27 --> 00:01:28 week is some good news.

00:01:30 --> 00:01:32 We are not going, going to be crashing

00:01:33 --> 00:01:34 into the Andromeda Galaxy.

00:01:35 --> 00:01:38 Professor Fred Watson: so we believe. That's right. So,

00:01:40 --> 00:01:42 the mantra among astronomers

00:01:43 --> 00:01:44 for probably

00:01:45 --> 00:01:48 decades has been, hang on

00:01:48 --> 00:01:50 to your hats, folks, because one day we're

00:01:50 --> 00:01:52 going to crash into the Andromeda Galaxy,

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54 probably in about three and a half billion

00:01:54 --> 00:01:57 years. The Andromeda galaxy, just to

00:01:57 --> 00:02:00 remind people, is the largest,

00:02:02 --> 00:02:05 the nearest large galaxy to our own.

00:02:06 --> 00:02:08 Ah. And it is, actually rather bigger than

00:02:08 --> 00:02:11 our own galaxy. and so we,

00:02:11 --> 00:02:14 have measured the speed of,

00:02:14 --> 00:02:17 what we call the radial velocity, the closing

00:02:17 --> 00:02:19 speed between our galaxy and the Andromeda

00:02:19 --> 00:02:21 Galaxy. That was a measurement that was

00:02:21 --> 00:02:23 probably made getting on for 100 years ago,

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 actually, and maybe more. and the

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 two are closing up now. We do get questions

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 occasionally on space knots from people

00:02:31 --> 00:02:33 saying, if the universe is expanding,

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36 why aren't galaxies all being drawn

00:02:36 --> 00:02:39 apart? And. Well, they are, but that's

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41 on the sort of mega scale. That's on the

00:02:41 --> 00:02:43 bigger scale of the universe. When you look

00:02:43 --> 00:02:46 at galaxies in the local environment,

00:02:46 --> 00:02:49 they are, sort of their motions are

00:02:49 --> 00:02:52 dominated by gravitational forces rather than

00:02:52 --> 00:02:54 by the expansion of the universe. And that's

00:02:54 --> 00:02:56 why in what we call our Local group, which is

00:02:56 --> 00:02:59 a group of about two dozen galaxies, the two

00:02:59 --> 00:03:01 Biggest are ourselves and Andromeda. they

00:03:01 --> 00:03:03 have motions that do not reflect the

00:03:03 --> 00:03:05 expansion of the universe because we're

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07 looking on too small a scale. It's when you

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09 look on the big scale that you see all

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 galaxies, whizzing away from us.

00:03:12 --> 00:03:14 So, as I said, an easy observation to make. a

00:03:14 --> 00:03:17 long, long time ago, astronomers deduced

00:03:17 --> 00:03:19 that, yes, the Andromeda Galaxy is heading

00:03:19 --> 00:03:20 towards us. I can't actually remember. The

00:03:20 --> 00:03:22 figure I should have checked it out is

00:03:22 --> 00:03:24 something like 200 in the region of 200

00:03:24 --> 00:03:27 kilometers per second, which sounds fearsome,

00:03:27 --> 00:03:30 excep, but it's two, and a

00:03:30 --> 00:03:32 half million light years away. So there's

00:03:32 --> 00:03:34 quite a long time to go, which is why we're

00:03:34 --> 00:03:36 talking about three and a half billion years.

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39 So bringing us a little bit up to date,

00:03:40 --> 00:03:43 more than a decade ago now, a European Space

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46 Agency spacecraft called Gaia was launched.

00:03:46 --> 00:03:49 And Gaia was an astrometry satellite. And

00:03:49 --> 00:03:51 what that means is it measured very

00:03:51 --> 00:03:54 accurately the positions of stars on

00:03:54 --> 00:03:57 the sky, their celestial coordinates, the

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59 kind of equivalent of latitude and longitude

00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 that we call right ascension and declination,

00:04:02 --> 00:04:04 just to give them fancy names. so,

00:04:05 --> 00:04:08 that spacecraft, measured, of course,

00:04:08 --> 00:04:10 many, in fact, billions of stars in our

00:04:10 --> 00:04:12 galaxy. It's been one of the most productive

00:04:12 --> 00:04:14 spacecraft. It's now been switched off. but,

00:04:14 --> 00:04:17 it also had a look at the Andromeda Galaxy.

00:04:17 --> 00:04:19 And the reason for that was to see

00:04:19 --> 00:04:22 whether there was any possibility that you

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24 might pick up what we call a transverse

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 motion. So what you measure,

00:04:27 --> 00:04:29 what's been measured for a long time, is the

00:04:29 --> 00:04:31 radial velocity. That's the velocity along

00:04:31 --> 00:04:34 the line of sight. And yes, Andromeda's

00:04:34 --> 00:04:36 coming towards us in that dimension.

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 But there's, of course, also possibly, a

00:04:39 --> 00:04:41 motion across the line of sight. We call it

00:04:41 --> 00:04:44 the transverse motion. And if that was big

00:04:44 --> 00:04:46 enough, then you'd get a miss. The Andromeda

00:04:46 --> 00:04:49 Galaxy would, by the time it reached us, be

00:04:49 --> 00:04:51 somewhere else. It wouldn't be along the same

00:04:51 --> 00:04:54 line of sight. So, that was measured by

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57 Gaia. And sure enough, I think what they did

00:04:57 --> 00:05:00 was put up a limits on the transverse motion

00:05:00 --> 00:05:02 because it's a very hard thing to do for an

00:05:02 --> 00:05:04 object 2 1/2 million light years away.

00:05:05 --> 00:05:08 So, the results, from the Gaia

00:05:08 --> 00:05:10 analysis were that the collision is

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13 inevitable. It's going to happen three and a

00:05:13 --> 00:05:15 half billion years ago. Put it in your diary,

00:05:15 --> 00:05:18 everybody. however, a new analysis.

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21 And this is getting to the point now, by

00:05:21 --> 00:05:23 astronomers, if I remember rightly, yes, the

00:05:23 --> 00:05:26 University of Helsinki in Finland.

00:05:26 --> 00:05:28 A, place where we know we've got many Space

00:05:28 --> 00:05:31 nuts listeners, which is great. What they've

00:05:31 --> 00:05:34 done is they've said, okay, that's all

00:05:34 --> 00:05:36 fine and dandy. Those Gaia measurements are

00:05:36 --> 00:05:39 interesting. They seem to suggest that it is

00:05:39 --> 00:05:42 actually coming our way. but what they've

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44 said is, wait a minute. we are, not the only

00:05:44 --> 00:05:47 kids on the block. the Andromeda Galaxy and

00:05:47 --> 00:05:50 our own are not the only large objects in the

00:05:50 --> 00:05:52 Local Group. There are others, including

00:05:53 --> 00:05:56 a, galaxy with the marvelous name of M. M33,

00:05:56 --> 00:05:58 in the constellation of Triangulum, another

00:05:58 --> 00:06:01 nearby. A nearby galaxy, not as big as

00:06:01 --> 00:06:04 our galaxy or Andromeda, but it's

00:06:04 --> 00:06:06 big enough to have its own gravitational

00:06:06 --> 00:06:08 forces. It'll have a significant

00:06:08 --> 00:06:10 gravitational pull on both ourselves and

00:06:10 --> 00:06:13 Andromeda. And they also folded in

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16 one, of the two Magellanic Clouds. These, are

00:06:16 --> 00:06:18 small dwarf galaxies which are in orbit

00:06:18 --> 00:06:20 around our own galaxy. In fact, they're being

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22 swallowed up by our own galaxy. The Large

00:06:22 --> 00:06:25 Magellanic Cloud is, a, galaxy

00:06:25 --> 00:06:28 containing probably a few billion stars

00:06:28 --> 00:06:29 rather than the few hundred billion that we

00:06:29 --> 00:06:32 would get in a big spiral galaxy. so

00:06:32 --> 00:06:35 they've taken, the gravity of that object

00:06:35 --> 00:06:37 into account as well. And when they do,

00:06:37 --> 00:06:40 they, find that the gravitational

00:06:40 --> 00:06:43 forces of those two other galaxies

00:06:44 --> 00:06:46 might well pull the,

00:06:47 --> 00:06:49 you know, the two colliding galaxies aside

00:06:50 --> 00:06:52 so that they don't collide.

00:06:54 --> 00:06:56 they've reported this in, actually one of the

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58 most prestigious journals, Nature Astronomy.

00:06:58 --> 00:07:01 their, article in that journal is

00:07:01 --> 00:07:04 called no Certainty of a Milky Way Andromeda

00:07:04 --> 00:07:07 Collision. So what they've done is they've

00:07:07 --> 00:07:08 kind of, you know,

00:07:10 --> 00:07:12 put the odds of a collision at lower than we

00:07:12 --> 00:07:14 thought they were before. Still could be a

00:07:14 --> 00:07:16 collision. We won't be here to find out.

00:07:17 --> 00:07:19 But they've put the odds lower than before.

00:07:20 --> 00:07:22 So maybe we can breathe a sigh of relief.

00:07:22 --> 00:07:24 Heidi Campo: Yeah, Well, I actually pulled up the article,

00:07:25 --> 00:07:27 the scientific article itself, and I have it

00:07:27 --> 00:07:29 pulled up, and I was just browsing over it.

00:07:30 --> 00:07:33 and this really is fantastic because I do

00:07:33 --> 00:07:36 love reading the actual science as it's

00:07:36 --> 00:07:37 written by the scientists.

00:07:38 --> 00:07:40 And there is one thing that I'm seeing here

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42 that maybe you can clarify for me and our

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44 listeners. it looks like they use something

00:07:44 --> 00:07:46 and I'm going to butcher this name. Half of

00:07:46 --> 00:07:47 you are going to laugh at me, and the other

00:07:47 --> 00:07:49 half of you are going to go, I don't know.

00:07:49 --> 00:07:50 Sounded right to me. A

00:07:50 --> 00:07:53 fiducill Fidical. Fidical

00:07:53 --> 00:07:54 model.

00:07:54 --> 00:07:55 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, fiducial.

00:07:56 --> 00:07:58 Heidi Campo: Fiducial. I was not close at all.

00:07:59 --> 00:08:01 a fiducial model. So what is the difference

00:08:01 --> 00:08:03 between a fiducial model for predicting

00:08:03 --> 00:08:06 these, orbits or collision

00:08:06 --> 00:08:09 courses versus what, what else might

00:08:09 --> 00:08:09 be used?

00:08:10 --> 00:08:13 Professor Fred Watson: I'm just looking at, ah, the context. Are you

00:08:13 --> 00:08:14 reading that from the abstract?

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17 Heidi Campo: I'm reading that it's actually down under

00:08:17 --> 00:08:19 predicting. It's in the main body of the

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21 article under predicting the future.

00:08:21 --> 00:08:23 Professor Fred Watson: A fiducial model based on the most accurate

00:08:23 --> 00:08:25 values available. That's a really interesting

00:08:25 --> 00:08:28 term. I haven't heard that term, used in this

00:08:28 --> 00:08:31 context before. Usually, a fiducial

00:08:31 --> 00:08:34 is a, A kind of marker. You call it a

00:08:34 --> 00:08:36 fiducial mark, which is

00:08:37 --> 00:08:40 giving you a zero point. And maybe that's the

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42 context in which that's being used. But,

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45 Yeah, great question there,

00:08:45 --> 00:08:48 Heidi. I should look through the paper myself

00:08:48 --> 00:08:50 in more detail. I did have a quick look at

00:08:50 --> 00:08:53 the abstract. I don't usually get down

00:08:53 --> 00:08:55 into the detail, but, I don't know why they

00:08:55 --> 00:08:56 call it a fiducial model.

00:08:56 --> 00:08:59 Heidi Campo: That's, I think that's the dirty secret of so

00:08:59 --> 00:09:01 many scientists. It's like we, we, we are

00:09:01 --> 00:09:04 also guilty of reading the abstract and if it

00:09:04 --> 00:09:06 looks interesting, we'll read the methods and

00:09:06 --> 00:09:09 everything else. But yeah, it's, you know,

00:09:09 --> 00:09:12 unless you're a super nerd, we're not always

00:09:12 --> 00:09:15 reading the entire article. For me, if I'm

00:09:15 --> 00:09:17 reading science, I, I read the headline.

00:09:17 --> 00:09:19 Okay, is this even in my, Is this even in my

00:09:20 --> 00:09:22 wheelhouse of something I'm interested in or

00:09:22 --> 00:09:24 need to know more about? Then I'll read the

00:09:24 --> 00:09:26 abstract. If the abstract catches my

00:09:26 --> 00:09:28 attention, then I will actually

00:09:29 --> 00:09:31 jump ahead. I'll skip the intro and

00:09:31 --> 00:09:33 background because if it's something I know

00:09:33 --> 00:09:34 about, then I usually already know what

00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 they're talking about. And I'll go straight

00:09:36 --> 00:09:38 into the methods and I'll be like, okay, well

00:09:38 --> 00:09:39 what did they do to get their information?

00:09:40 --> 00:09:42 Then I'll jump ahead to their,

00:09:43 --> 00:09:45 results and I'll see, okay, you know, do

00:09:45 --> 00:09:48 their results make sense? And then I'll read

00:09:48 --> 00:09:51 their dissemination of those results to see

00:09:51 --> 00:09:53 if I agree with their conclusions.

00:09:55 --> 00:09:56 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, I've just been,

00:09:58 --> 00:10:00 Exactly. You've described the way I look at

00:10:00 --> 00:10:02 these things as well. I've just been googling

00:10:02 --> 00:10:03 a fiducial model.

00:10:05 --> 00:10:08 And as it says, fiducials are marks or points

00:10:08 --> 00:10:11 of reference applied to, well, in this case,

00:10:11 --> 00:10:13 images to present a fixed

00:10:13 --> 00:10:16 standard of reference. So that was kind of

00:10:16 --> 00:10:19 my assumption of what the word

00:10:19 --> 00:10:21 means. But a fiducial model gives you,

00:10:22 --> 00:10:24 obviously a fixed standard of reference to

00:10:24 --> 00:10:26 start from, which is tricky when you're

00:10:26 --> 00:10:28 talking about colliding galaxies, because

00:10:28 --> 00:10:30 which of them's moving? Well, they're both

00:10:30 --> 00:10:32 moving. So, you know, where's your reference

00:10:32 --> 00:10:34 point? Where is your stationary standard

00:10:34 --> 00:10:34 point?

00:10:35 --> 00:10:38 Heidi Campo: Yeah, and maybe this can be, you know, you

00:10:38 --> 00:10:39 know, and as scientists, we can say, okay,

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41 you know, this was published in a prestigious

00:10:41 --> 00:10:44 article, so we can assume that the

00:10:44 --> 00:10:47 methods were good enough to get published,

00:10:47 --> 00:10:49 because the process of getting published is

00:10:49 --> 00:10:51 already so rigorous. But this could be

00:10:51 --> 00:10:53 another point where we go and we're like,

00:10:53 --> 00:10:55 hey, you know, is that mathematical model

00:10:55 --> 00:10:58 something that you would agree with?

00:10:58 --> 00:11:00 The results, you know, is like you just said,

00:11:00 --> 00:11:02 is a fixed model really going to tell us

00:11:03 --> 00:11:04 what's moving? Well, what's not?

00:11:04 --> 00:11:05 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's right.

00:11:06 --> 00:11:08 Heidi Campo: Take. This stuff's kind of interesting.

00:11:10 --> 00:11:13 Roger, your labs are here. Also space nuts.

00:11:13 --> 00:11:16 But, you know, fiducial models,

00:11:16 --> 00:11:19 mathematic algorithms and flying

00:11:19 --> 00:11:21 bananas is my next question, Because

00:11:23 --> 00:11:26 a flying banana is the topic of our next

00:11:26 --> 00:11:27 article. And this is going to be another

00:11:27 --> 00:11:29 thing I need you to define, because if I'm

00:11:29 --> 00:11:32 thinking of a flying banana, I'm thinking

00:11:32 --> 00:11:35 that somebody's kid at the grocery store is

00:11:35 --> 00:11:38 throwing a fit and they're throwing food. But

00:11:38 --> 00:11:41 in this article, we're talking about, aura

00:11:41 --> 00:11:41 chasers.

00:11:42 --> 00:11:45 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Yes. So I'll, get to the flying banana

00:11:45 --> 00:11:46 in a minute

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50 because that's, kind of nickname.

00:11:50 --> 00:11:53 But, what I love about this story is

00:11:53 --> 00:11:55 it combines two passions of mine, one

00:11:55 --> 00:11:58 of which is the, aurora borealis, the

00:11:58 --> 00:12:01 northern light, which, we make regular trips

00:12:01 --> 00:12:03 up to the far northern Arctic to watch and

00:12:03 --> 00:12:06 take our tour guests up there to be

00:12:06 --> 00:12:09 awed by the aurora. We get southern lights

00:12:09 --> 00:12:11 down here, in the southern hemisphere as

00:12:11 --> 00:12:13 well, the aurora australis. Heidi. And

00:12:13 --> 00:12:14 there's actually been some quite good

00:12:14 --> 00:12:17 sightings recently of the aurora australis

00:12:17 --> 00:12:20 from southern Australia. we're not anywhere

00:12:20 --> 00:12:23 near far enough south to see the aurora

00:12:23 --> 00:12:25 overhead as you do from Alaska or far

00:12:25 --> 00:12:28 northern Scandinavia. but nevertheless, you

00:12:28 --> 00:12:31 can see the aurora. So that's one passion is

00:12:31 --> 00:12:33 the aurora. but, this is.

00:12:34 --> 00:12:37 It's a report that comes initially from

00:12:37 --> 00:12:40 fellow aurora hunters. And these are people

00:12:40 --> 00:12:41 in the United Kingdom, actually in

00:12:41 --> 00:12:44 Oxfordshire in England. and they were, you

00:12:44 --> 00:12:46 know, basically out on a clear night looking

00:12:46 --> 00:12:48 for, the northern lights, the aurora

00:12:48 --> 00:12:51 borealis. But what they saw was this

00:12:51 --> 00:12:54 strange blue beam of light sort of

00:12:54 --> 00:12:57 slicing through the night sky and

00:12:57 --> 00:13:00 apparently moving. and in fact

00:13:00 --> 00:13:03 these are sort of, you know, very high

00:13:03 --> 00:13:05 level aurora hunters because they've got an

00:13:05 --> 00:13:08 all sky camera, and fixed cameras that

00:13:08 --> 00:13:11 have captured this strange blue light moving

00:13:11 --> 00:13:13 through the sky. Excuse me. the reason

00:13:13 --> 00:13:16 why the. Well two things told

00:13:16 --> 00:13:19 them that it wasn't an aurora. One is that

00:13:19 --> 00:13:22 most aurorae aren't blue. the colors you get

00:13:22 --> 00:13:25 typically are green, and red

00:13:25 --> 00:13:28 which come from oxygen atoms. you get

00:13:28 --> 00:13:31 purples and magenta and a few other

00:13:31 --> 00:13:33 colors coming from nitrogen molecules. But a

00:13:33 --> 00:13:36 pure blue light is something that

00:13:36 --> 00:13:39 no you don't actually see. and so

00:13:39 --> 00:13:42 what they wondered was what is this?

00:13:42 --> 00:13:44 It's clearly not a natural national

00:13:44 --> 00:13:47 phenomenon. Sorry, a natural phenomenon

00:13:47 --> 00:13:49 because it's the wrong color and it's moving

00:13:49 --> 00:13:51 too quickly. So they did some

00:13:52 --> 00:13:55 they did some research, and

00:13:55 --> 00:13:57 it turns out that what they had seen

00:13:58 --> 00:14:01 was a very fat, a wide

00:14:01 --> 00:14:04 laser beam pointing upwards that

00:14:04 --> 00:14:06 came from the flying banana. And what

00:14:06 --> 00:14:09 is the flying banana? It's a railway

00:14:09 --> 00:14:12 train. and it's called that because it

00:14:12 --> 00:14:15 is yellow. It's very, very yellow

00:14:15 --> 00:14:17 indeed. The flying banana. its

00:14:17 --> 00:14:20 technical term is the nmt, the new

00:14:20 --> 00:14:22 measurement train. And what it does

00:14:22 --> 00:14:24 is at speeds of up to

00:14:24 --> 00:14:27 125mph getting

00:14:27 --> 00:14:30 on for 200km an hour in our measure.

00:14:30 --> 00:14:32 it flies,

00:14:33 --> 00:14:35 runs over the track. Sorry about our little

00:14:35 --> 00:14:37 puppy in the background. I don't know whether

00:14:37 --> 00:14:39 you can hear him barking but he's excited

00:14:39 --> 00:14:40 about the Flying Banana as well.

00:14:43 --> 00:14:45 this train runs over the track 125

00:14:46 --> 00:14:49 miles an hour with lasers pointing downwards

00:14:49 --> 00:14:52 to analyze in real time the

00:14:52 --> 00:14:54 state of the track. So it's all about the

00:14:54 --> 00:14:57 safety of railway passengers in the UK and

00:14:57 --> 00:14:59 what it's doing is it's analyzing things like

00:14:59 --> 00:15:01 the separation of the rails, whether

00:15:02 --> 00:15:04 something's moved in the foundations of the

00:15:04 --> 00:15:06 rails, the sleepers or ties as you call them

00:15:06 --> 00:15:09 in the US that hold them together, whether

00:15:09 --> 00:15:12 the rails themselves are distorted. They can

00:15:12 --> 00:15:14 check the shape of the rails, they can check

00:15:14 --> 00:15:16 all sorts of aspects of it at a very high

00:15:16 --> 00:15:19 speed. But, and this is the trick,

00:15:19 --> 00:15:22 it also checks the overhead

00:15:22 --> 00:15:24 electrical wiring because railways in

00:15:24 --> 00:15:26 Britain, many of them certainly the main

00:15:26 --> 00:15:28 lines are driven by electric

00:15:29 --> 00:15:31 traction. So they've got what's called the

00:15:31 --> 00:15:33 overhead, the overhead wire which is picked

00:15:33 --> 00:15:35 up, from which the electricity is picked up

00:15:35 --> 00:15:38 by the trains. So as I understand it,

00:15:38 --> 00:15:41 it, this laser is also looking

00:15:41 --> 00:15:44 upwards to sense what the condition of the

00:15:44 --> 00:15:46 Overhead wire is hence the blue light

00:15:46 --> 00:15:49 traveling through the landscape.

00:15:50 --> 00:15:53 and, just before, Sorry, I'm not letting you

00:15:53 --> 00:15:55 get many words in here, Heidi, but.

00:15:55 --> 00:15:57 Heidi Campo: No, I'm listening. This is wonderful.

00:15:58 --> 00:16:01 Professor Fred Watson: Well, to, bring back an experience

00:16:01 --> 00:16:03 we had. So back in January this year,

00:16:04 --> 00:16:05 some of our listeners know, I think, you

00:16:05 --> 00:16:07 know, Marnie and I were doing one of our,

00:16:07 --> 00:16:10 Aurora Borealis tours up in the far north

00:16:10 --> 00:16:13 of the world. We were in northern

00:16:13 --> 00:16:16 Norway, Scandinavia, sorry, Norway, Sweden,

00:16:16 --> 00:16:19 Iceland and eventually Greenland, which

00:16:19 --> 00:16:21 was enchanting. But, that's not why I'm

00:16:21 --> 00:16:24 mentioning it. in a place called Abisko,

00:16:25 --> 00:16:27 which is in far northern Sweden, one

00:16:27 --> 00:16:30 night we were aurora watching and we saw

00:16:31 --> 00:16:33 this vertical green beam of

00:16:33 --> 00:16:36 light, which puzzled me

00:16:36 --> 00:16:39 completely. it was just pointing

00:16:39 --> 00:16:41 upwards. It was apparently stationary. It did

00:16:41 --> 00:16:44 not last very long. I had my trusty

00:16:44 --> 00:16:46 Aurora camera, ready to take photographs, but

00:16:46 --> 00:16:49 it had gone before, I had

00:16:49 --> 00:16:52 a chance to take any. but I'm guessing

00:16:52 --> 00:16:54 now that that was the same

00:16:54 --> 00:16:57 sort of thing because Abisco is

00:16:57 --> 00:17:00 on the main line between. The main railway

00:17:00 --> 00:17:03 line between, Kiruna, and

00:17:03 --> 00:17:05 Narvik. It was buil built,

00:17:06 --> 00:17:09 more than a century ago to carry iron ore

00:17:09 --> 00:17:11 from the big mine, which is still operational

00:17:11 --> 00:17:13 in Kiruna, to the port in Narvik, where

00:17:13 --> 00:17:15 it's exported all over the world to your

00:17:15 --> 00:17:18 country and mine, it's one of the biggest

00:17:18 --> 00:17:21 producers of iron ore in the world. And so

00:17:21 --> 00:17:23 that railway line has been there for a long

00:17:23 --> 00:17:26 time. And my guess is that maybe

00:17:26 --> 00:17:29 there is an equivalent in Sweden of the

00:17:29 --> 00:17:32 Flying Banana, which shines a green,

00:17:32 --> 00:17:35 laser beam up at the overhead wires to

00:17:35 --> 00:17:37 see, what the condition is. And so I'm

00:17:37 --> 00:17:40 putting out to our Scandinavian listeners, on

00:17:40 --> 00:17:41 space nuts, because I know a lot of them are

00:17:41 --> 00:17:44 railway buffs as well. Tell us if there is

00:17:44 --> 00:17:47 such a thing as a new measurement train

00:17:47 --> 00:17:50 in Scandinavia that looks at the overhead,

00:17:50 --> 00:17:52 catenaries or, ah, the overhead, power lines

00:17:52 --> 00:17:55 for trains. So we look forward to

00:17:55 --> 00:17:57 hearing your answers, folks.

00:17:57 --> 00:17:59 Heidi Campo: Yeah, and that's, you know, and that's just

00:17:59 --> 00:18:01 such a fun story. And it makes me, you know,

00:18:01 --> 00:18:04 cause trains, trains are

00:18:04 --> 00:18:07 such, an incredible feat of

00:18:07 --> 00:18:10 engineering that changed the world. I think

00:18:10 --> 00:18:11 trains accelerated

00:18:12 --> 00:18:14 expansion and growth more than almost

00:18:14 --> 00:18:17 anything else. And I'm sure you and most of

00:18:17 --> 00:18:19 the listeners know the correlation between

00:18:19 --> 00:18:21 rocket ships and trains.

00:18:23 --> 00:18:25 Professor Fred Watson: Okay, tell me what you're thinking of.

00:18:25 --> 00:18:28 Heidi Campo: Okay, so,

00:18:30 --> 00:18:32 now I might be butchering this here because I

00:18:32 --> 00:18:34 Think it's, something about the

00:18:34 --> 00:18:36 rockets. The size of them

00:18:37 --> 00:18:39 is a certain size. And

00:18:39 --> 00:18:42 that size is determined because of

00:18:42 --> 00:18:45 the standard size of. See, what is it? What

00:18:45 --> 00:18:46 is it? Because I know you probably have it

00:18:46 --> 00:18:47 down to the figures.

00:18:48 --> 00:18:51 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. So you're absolutely right. It's

00:18:51 --> 00:18:53 railway lines and railway tunnels, that

00:18:53 --> 00:18:56 dictate the size of things. I

00:18:56 --> 00:18:57 don't know the exact thing that you're

00:18:57 --> 00:19:00 talking about, but limited. All sorts of

00:19:00 --> 00:19:02 weird things like the size of the biggest

00:19:02 --> 00:19:03 telescope mirror that you can take from one

00:19:03 --> 00:19:06 place to another is limited by the size of

00:19:06 --> 00:19:08 the track, the railway tunnels that carry

00:19:08 --> 00:19:10 them around. It might well be something

00:19:10 --> 00:19:12 similar that you're thinking of in terms of

00:19:12 --> 00:19:12 rockets.

00:19:12 --> 00:19:15 Heidi Campo: And if you keep going back far enough. The

00:19:15 --> 00:19:18 size of the railroad was determined

00:19:18 --> 00:19:20 by the average size of two horses

00:19:21 --> 00:19:23 side by side. So the joke is two

00:19:23 --> 00:19:26 horses asses is what determines the

00:19:26 --> 00:19:29 size of our rockets in space today.

00:19:29 --> 00:19:32 And trains, which is just such a

00:19:32 --> 00:19:34 funny little thing to think of. And just

00:19:35 --> 00:19:37 again, amazing feats of engineering and

00:19:37 --> 00:19:39 there's nothing new that's ever built. We're

00:19:39 --> 00:19:41 always just building and expanding on, the

00:19:41 --> 00:19:43 prior knowledge we already have. So hopefully

00:19:43 --> 00:19:46 our ancestors have done pretty good work.

00:19:48 --> 00:19:49 Professor Fred Watson: Okay.

00:19:49 --> 00:19:50 Andrew Dunkley: We checked all four systems and being.

00:19:50 --> 00:19:53 Heidi Campo: With a girl, space nets, and

00:19:53 --> 00:19:56 sometimes, you know, things are, are

00:19:56 --> 00:19:58 unsuccessful. You know, we have amazing

00:19:58 --> 00:20:01 things, we have things that fall apart. And

00:20:01 --> 00:20:03 there was, you know, that's the case of what

00:20:03 --> 00:20:06 happened with the Japanese company

00:20:06 --> 00:20:09 abandoning, their moon mission. So tell

00:20:09 --> 00:20:11 us what happened with that. Just kind of been

00:20:11 --> 00:20:12 a blur.

00:20:13 --> 00:20:15 Professor Fred Watson: Lovely segue there, Heidi. I love your

00:20:15 --> 00:20:17 segues. From one story to another.

00:20:19 --> 00:20:22 And you're right, this is an endeavor which,

00:20:22 --> 00:20:24 you know, again, is being carried out with

00:20:24 --> 00:20:26 the highest levels of technical knowledge,

00:20:26 --> 00:20:29 with the highest enthusiasm, and all the

00:20:29 --> 00:20:32 skill, that has been learned from,

00:20:32 --> 00:20:35 well, more than 50 years now of space travel

00:20:35 --> 00:20:37 in terms of robotic spacecraft, as

00:20:38 --> 00:20:40 Newton said, standing on the shoulders of

00:20:40 --> 00:20:42 giants. I think every, every one of us is

00:20:42 --> 00:20:43 doing that one way or another in the

00:20:43 --> 00:20:46 technology that we make use of. So, in fact,

00:20:46 --> 00:20:49 some of that technology is just going past my

00:20:49 --> 00:20:51 office door at the moment. that's called

00:20:51 --> 00:20:53 Grimace. Grimace is our robotic vacuum

00:20:53 --> 00:20:56 cleaner. And Grimace makes a lot of

00:20:56 --> 00:20:58 noise. So if you hear a, whining sound, it's

00:20:58 --> 00:21:00 not me, it's our vacuum cleaner.

00:21:00 --> 00:21:03 Heidi Campo: I named my robotic vacuum, Rosie

00:21:03 --> 00:21:04 after the Jetsons.

00:21:04 --> 00:21:06 Professor Fred Watson: Okay, good, that's great.

00:21:07 --> 00:21:08 Heidi Campo: Robotic made was Rosie.

00:21:09 --> 00:21:10 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yeah, you've got to give them names.

00:21:10 --> 00:21:13 Ours is called Grimace because A grimace is

00:21:13 --> 00:21:15 the expression on its face. It doesn't have a

00:21:15 --> 00:21:17 face, but it just looks as though it's, you

00:21:17 --> 00:21:20 know, it's got a very stern expression.

00:21:20 --> 00:21:23 Anyway, turning back to the Japanese company

00:21:23 --> 00:21:26 Ispace, they have. And as

00:21:26 --> 00:21:28 you've said, it doesn't always work. and

00:21:29 --> 00:21:31 in this case, this does not. This has not

00:21:31 --> 00:21:34 worked. what they have done is,

00:21:34 --> 00:21:37 sent to the moon, basically, a

00:21:37 --> 00:21:39 lunar lander which

00:21:40 --> 00:21:42 indeed had on board a rover,

00:21:42 --> 00:21:45 a little rover. The lander,

00:21:45 --> 00:21:48 if I remember rightly, is called Resilience.

00:21:48 --> 00:21:50 and the rover had a name too, which you can't

00:21:50 --> 00:21:52 remember, but it's something similar. so the

00:21:52 --> 00:21:55 idea of, this company is to

00:21:55 --> 00:21:58 be one of the first, companies

00:21:58 --> 00:22:01 in the world to achieve a

00:22:01 --> 00:22:04 landing, a soft landing on the moon. And

00:22:04 --> 00:22:06 it would certainly have been the first one to

00:22:06 --> 00:22:08 have the first private company to have a

00:22:08 --> 00:22:10 rover on them moon. sadly, the mission

00:22:11 --> 00:22:13 was not successful. This was last week, as we

00:22:13 --> 00:22:15 are recording this episode now.

00:22:16 --> 00:22:18 everything went perfectly well with,

00:22:18 --> 00:22:21 Resilience, until it got close to the lunar

00:22:21 --> 00:22:24 surface. And then there was a technical fault

00:22:24 --> 00:22:26 that meant that it didn't decelerate

00:22:26 --> 00:22:29 quickly enough, for it to make a soft

00:22:29 --> 00:22:32 landing. So it actually, basically had

00:22:32 --> 00:22:34 a hard landing on the moon, which we usually

00:22:34 --> 00:22:36 call a collision. and that, was the end

00:22:36 --> 00:22:39 of the mission. they're very enthusiastic

00:22:39 --> 00:22:42 though, about keeping going

00:22:42 --> 00:22:44 with their, endeavors. Unfortunately, it's

00:22:44 --> 00:22:46 their second failure. I think a couple of

00:22:46 --> 00:22:49 years ago they had another mission, landing

00:22:49 --> 00:22:52 on the moon, which did not, make it.

00:22:52 --> 00:22:55 It landed, but sort of fell over. It was, at

00:22:55 --> 00:22:57 the wrong angle, so didn't get,

00:22:58 --> 00:23:00 any kind of sunlight on its solar panels. I

00:23:00 --> 00:23:02 think I'm thinking of the right one there.

00:23:02 --> 00:23:04 And by the way, the rover rover was called

00:23:04 --> 00:23:07 Tenacious, built in Luxembourg in

00:23:07 --> 00:23:10 fact, but carried, some equipment on board.

00:23:10 --> 00:23:12 Sadly, that was never deployed. So,

00:23:13 --> 00:23:16 you know, a story that's got good parts to

00:23:16 --> 00:23:18 it because I'm sure they learned a lot from

00:23:18 --> 00:23:21 this mission, but not as successful as

00:23:21 --> 00:23:22 everybody had hoped.

00:23:23 --> 00:23:25 Heidi Campo: I always have a little soft spot for the

00:23:25 --> 00:23:27 rovers. Ever since they had, the Mars

00:23:27 --> 00:23:30 rover sing Happy Birthday to itself. I've

00:23:30 --> 00:23:32 always kind of humanized them ever since

00:23:32 --> 00:23:34 that. I don't know why I'm like, oh, poor

00:23:34 --> 00:23:37 rover. Maybe it was Pixar's Wall E that

00:23:37 --> 00:23:39 gave me a soft spot for these, robots. Good

00:23:39 --> 00:23:41 old Wall E. But, you know, here's another

00:23:41 --> 00:23:42 segue for you.

00:23:42 --> 00:23:44 Speaking of Mars rovers, the Mars

00:23:44 --> 00:23:47 Orbiter capture. This is our final

00:23:47 --> 00:23:50 story for today, but the NASA Mars Orbiter

00:23:50 --> 00:23:53 saw some pretty cool

00:23:54 --> 00:23:56 sites. You want to tell us a little bit about

00:23:56 --> 00:23:57 these volcanoes?

00:23:57 --> 00:24:00 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's right. So this is

00:24:01 --> 00:24:03 it's a piece of history almost. This is one

00:24:03 --> 00:24:05 of the longest running

00:24:06 --> 00:24:09 orbiters around Mars. I think

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12 it's been in orbit since 2001 or it

00:24:12 --> 00:24:15 certainly was launched in 2001. And it is

00:24:15 --> 00:24:17 called Mars Odyssey. it's a NASA

00:24:17 --> 00:24:20 spacecraft, one of several in orbit around

00:24:20 --> 00:24:23 Mars. but this is quite a venerable one.

00:24:23 --> 00:24:25 It's been around for a long time but it's

00:24:25 --> 00:24:27 still active and it's still doing the

00:24:27 --> 00:24:30 kind of research that it was basically built

00:24:30 --> 00:24:32 to do. looking at the upper atmosphere of

00:24:32 --> 00:24:35 Mars and basically you know,

00:24:35 --> 00:24:38 studying the surface. the reason why it's

00:24:38 --> 00:24:41 made the headlines this week is because

00:24:41 --> 00:24:44 it captured a beautiful view

00:24:45 --> 00:24:47 of one of Mars's tall

00:24:47 --> 00:24:50 volcanoes. Mars has ah, an

00:24:50 --> 00:24:53 area called the Tarsus Rise. It's a high

00:24:53 --> 00:24:55 level or Tarsis Montesquieu, the Tharsis

00:24:55 --> 00:24:58 Mountains. it's a high level region which

00:24:58 --> 00:25:01 has ah, four really

00:25:01 --> 00:25:04 prominent volcanoes on it. They are extinct.

00:25:04 --> 00:25:06 They probably have not erupted for 3 billion

00:25:06 --> 00:25:09 years or so. they're taller than most

00:25:09 --> 00:25:11 volcanoes on Earth, 20 kilometers or so.

00:25:12 --> 00:25:15 the biggest is Olympus Mons, very famous, the

00:25:15 --> 00:25:17 largest mountain in the solar system. but

00:25:17 --> 00:25:20 what they've captured with the Odyssey

00:25:20 --> 00:25:23 spacecraft is a view of Mars

00:25:23 --> 00:25:25 in the early morning. It's in the dawn

00:25:26 --> 00:25:28 sky and sorry, the dawn landscape.

00:25:29 --> 00:25:32 but the surface of Mars is covered with

00:25:32 --> 00:25:34 cloud. Now Mars does

00:25:34 --> 00:25:37 have clouds. They are fairly thin clouds

00:25:37 --> 00:25:38 because its atmospheric pressure is only

00:25:39 --> 00:25:42 0.6% of the atmospheric pressure

00:25:42 --> 00:25:45 on Earth. And there is very little moisture

00:25:45 --> 00:25:47 in the atmosphere. There is some, there's

00:25:47 --> 00:25:48 enough to form clouds and they're made of

00:25:48 --> 00:25:51 ice, basically water ice. so there's

00:25:51 --> 00:25:53 enough just to form these. But here's this

00:25:53 --> 00:25:56 wonderful view. Encourage people to look

00:25:56 --> 00:25:59 at one of the NASA websites. Actually it's

00:25:59 --> 00:26:02 the main NASA website actually NASA.gov if

00:26:02 --> 00:26:05 you Google NASA Mars Orbiter

00:26:05 --> 00:26:07 captures volcano peaking above morning cloud

00:26:07 --> 00:26:09 tops that's exactly what you see. this is

00:26:10 --> 00:26:13 Asia Mons which is one of the other four

00:26:13 --> 00:26:15 volcanoes in that region. And you can see its

00:26:15 --> 00:26:18 crater, its caldera, the summit

00:26:18 --> 00:26:20 of the mountain, poking above the low

00:26:20 --> 00:26:22 clouds on the surface of Mars. It's an

00:26:22 --> 00:26:24 extraordinary view. It's one that we've not

00:26:24 --> 00:26:27 seen before. And it was, made because the

00:26:27 --> 00:26:29 mission scientists managed to turn Mars

00:26:29 --> 00:26:31 Odyssey on its side so it could look

00:26:31 --> 00:26:33 horizontally at the landscape rather than

00:26:33 --> 00:26:36 looking vertically downwards on the surface

00:26:36 --> 00:26:36 of Mars.

00:26:37 --> 00:26:39 Heidi Campo: Yeah, this is a great photo. That's, one of

00:26:39 --> 00:26:41 those ones that's going to be hanging up in,

00:26:41 --> 00:26:44 someone's office, one day or

00:26:44 --> 00:26:46 a school, you know, in a science building. I

00:26:46 --> 00:26:48 mean, that really is a really neat photo.

00:26:48 --> 00:26:51 Like you said. I mean, what,

00:26:52 --> 00:26:54 ah, crazy, ah, series of

00:26:54 --> 00:26:57 stories today from the things that we've

00:26:57 --> 00:26:59 discovered and the technology and

00:27:00 --> 00:27:03 everything that humans, have done and they're

00:27:03 --> 00:27:06 still doing. it's really. And I

00:27:06 --> 00:27:08 think that's one reason why we're space

00:27:08 --> 00:27:11 nuts here. I mean, all of us here get so

00:27:11 --> 00:27:14 excited about space because there's, I think

00:27:14 --> 00:27:16 for the people who are space enthusiasts,

00:27:16 --> 00:27:18 it's because there's still so much to do

00:27:19 --> 00:27:21 and so many other, fields of

00:27:23 --> 00:27:25 anything. There's so much that's already been

00:27:25 --> 00:27:27 explained and discovered. We're not

00:27:27 --> 00:27:29 discovering any new laws of physics anymore.

00:27:29 --> 00:27:32 That's kind of those are written, but in

00:27:32 --> 00:27:35 space it's wide open and we're always coming

00:27:35 --> 00:27:38 up with new mathematical formulas and

00:27:38 --> 00:27:40 feats of engineering and discovery.

00:27:41 --> 00:27:43 We have our highs, we have our lows. But

00:27:45 --> 00:27:48 it's so exciting for the people who are still

00:27:48 --> 00:27:51 curious and want to know more about

00:27:51 --> 00:27:53 the universe we live in.

00:27:54 --> 00:27:57 Professor Fred Watson: Isn't it just. And, you know, I guess that

00:27:57 --> 00:27:58 curiosity is one of the things that drives

00:27:58 --> 00:28:01 the million or so downloads a year that we

00:28:01 --> 00:28:03 get of space nuts. Because we've got people

00:28:03 --> 00:28:05 out there who love to hear about this sort of

00:28:05 --> 00:28:07 thing just as we love talking about it.

00:28:07 --> 00:28:10 Everything from flying bananas to colliding

00:28:10 --> 00:28:10 galaxies.

00:28:10 --> 00:28:13 Heidi Campo: We do everything and we

00:28:13 --> 00:28:14 just want to, you know, I guess we'll just

00:28:14 --> 00:28:16 say thank you to our listeners. Thank you for

00:28:16 --> 00:28:19 making, this, this a show worth recording. We

00:28:19 --> 00:28:21 really do appreciate you guys. And thank you

00:28:21 --> 00:28:23 for letting me come on as your substitute

00:28:23 --> 00:28:26 host while Andrew is on holiday.

00:28:26 --> 00:28:29 he will be back with you in a

00:28:29 --> 00:28:31 few weeks, so don't you worry. If you guys

00:28:31 --> 00:28:33 are missing him dearly, he will be back. I am

00:28:33 --> 00:28:36 just filling in for now, but, Go ahead,

00:28:36 --> 00:28:36 Peter.

00:28:37 --> 00:28:40 Professor Fred Watson: Let me just add, forgive me, I

00:28:40 --> 00:28:42 think our producer Huw might well,

00:28:42 --> 00:28:45 include in this podcast, a little

00:28:45 --> 00:28:47 recording that Andrew has sent on his

00:28:47 --> 00:28:50 progress around the world. So, listen

00:28:50 --> 00:28:52 on, folks. You might well hear, Andrew's

00:28:52 --> 00:28:55 voice telling us where he's Got to on his

00:28:55 --> 00:28:56 round the world trip.

00:28:56 --> 00:28:58 Andrew Dunkley: Hi Heidi. Hi Fred. Hi Huw in the studio,

00:28:59 --> 00:28:59 it's Andrew.

00:29:00 --> 00:29:02 we've embarked on our around the world trip

00:29:02 --> 00:29:05 on the Crown Princess. we left

00:29:05 --> 00:29:08 Sydney a couple of days ago and we got out

00:29:08 --> 00:29:11 of the heads and it was rough as guts. I

00:29:11 --> 00:29:14 mean it was heavy seas. the

00:29:14 --> 00:29:17 pilot couldn't even get off the ship and we

00:29:17 --> 00:29:18 had to drop him off at Eden down near the

00:29:18 --> 00:29:21 Victoria border, yesterday. So yeah,

00:29:21 --> 00:29:23 things calmed down a bit after that. But it

00:29:23 --> 00:29:26 was a pretty rough on first night. last

00:29:26 --> 00:29:28 night we slept quite well. It was very, very

00:29:28 --> 00:29:31 calm. we went through Bass Strait. I was

00:29:31 --> 00:29:33 very hopeful that we'd be able to see Aurora

00:29:33 --> 00:29:35 Austral Australis. There's been a fair bit of

00:29:35 --> 00:29:38 sun activity lately and I was very

00:29:38 --> 00:29:40 hopeful. There'd been a bit about it in the

00:29:40 --> 00:29:43 news recently but unfortunately

00:29:43 --> 00:29:45 we've not seen anything and in fact they're

00:29:45 --> 00:29:48 not letting us up on the the decks at the

00:29:48 --> 00:29:50 moment because, because of the conditions

00:29:51 --> 00:29:53 which are deteriorating again as we approach

00:29:54 --> 00:29:57 Spencer Gulf and head to Adelaide. So

00:29:57 --> 00:29:58 we'll be dropping off at Adelaide tomorrow

00:29:58 --> 00:30:01 and visiting the German town of Haendorf.

00:30:02 --> 00:30:05 activities on board have been fun. it's a fun

00:30:05 --> 00:30:07 crowd, a fun crew. We're having a good time.

00:30:07 --> 00:30:10 Yes, I got seasick once. We ordered

00:30:10 --> 00:30:12 breakfast and then cancelled it, then ordered

00:30:12 --> 00:30:14 again and got three breakfasts.

00:30:15 --> 00:30:18 So there's you know, you know, a few glitches

00:30:18 --> 00:30:19 here and there. But we're having a great

00:30:19 --> 00:30:22 time. I hope all is going well. I'll report

00:30:22 --> 00:30:25 in semi regularly as we, as we do things

00:30:25 --> 00:30:28 around the ship and around the world. So for

00:30:28 --> 00:30:30 now I'll see you later and

00:30:30 --> 00:30:33 have fun with Space Nuts while I'm away.

00:30:33 --> 00:30:36 Heidi Campo: So fun. Thank you Fred. Talk to you next

00:30:36 --> 00:30:36 week.

00:30:36 --> 00:30:38 Professor Fred Watson: It's a great pleasure Heidi. Thanks very

00:30:38 --> 00:30:40 much. Space Nuts. you'll be listening to the

00:30:40 --> 00:30:43 SpaceNuts podcast Missing Point,

00:30:43 --> 00:30:45 available at Apple Podcasts.

00:30:45 --> 00:30:48 Andrew Dunkley: Spotify, iHeartRadio or your

00:30:48 --> 00:30:49 favorite podcast player.

00:30:49 --> 00:30:52 Professor Fred Watson: You can also stream on demand@bytes.com

00:30:53 --> 00:30:53 this.

00:30:53 --> 00:30:55 Andrew Dunkley: Has been another quality podcast production

00:30:55 --> 00:30:57 from bytes.um com.