Cosmic Detectives: Solving the Missing Matter Mystery & Exploring Earth's Magnetic Secrets
Space Nuts: Exploring the CosmosJune 26, 2025
533
00:34:3231.67 MB

Cosmic Detectives: Solving the Missing Matter Mystery & Exploring Earth's Magnetic Secrets

Unraveling Cosmic Mysteries: Fast Radio Bursts and Earth's Magnetism
In this intriguing episode of Space Nuts, hosts Heidi Campo and Professor Fred Watson delve into the captivating world of cosmic enigmas. From the potential resolution of the 'missing matter' mystery to the groundbreaking findings linking Earth's magnetism and oxygen levels, this episode is packed with revelations that will spark your curiosity about the universe.
Episode Highlights:
Fast Radio Bursts and Missing Matter: The episode kicks off with a discussion on fast radio bursts, their origins, and how they may help astronomers account for the elusive missing matter in the universe. Fred explains the significance of these brief bursts of radio waves and their role in revealing the intergalactic medium's composition.
Understanding Neutron Stars: Heidi and Fred take a moment to clarify the difference between neutron stars and our sun, exploring the fascinating life cycle of stars and the unique characteristics of neutron stars that lead to phenomena like magnetars and fast radio bursts.
Proba 3 Mission and Solar Eclipses: The conversation shifts to the European Space Agency's Proba 3 mission, which aims to study the sun's corona using two satellites. Fred shares how this innovative approach allows scientists to observe the sun's outer atmosphere in detail, akin to a solar eclipse, and the potential for citizen scientists to engage with this data.
Link Between Magnetism and Oxygen: The episode concludes with a discussion on a recent study revealing a mysterious correlation between Earth's magnetic field strength and atmospheric oxygen levels over the past 500 million years. Fred emphasizes the implications of this finding for understanding life processes and the search for extraterrestrial life.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
(00:00) Welcome to Space Nuts with Heidi Campo and Fred Watson
(01:20) Discussion on fast radio bursts and missing matter
(15:00) Clarifying neutron stars vs. our sun
(25:30) Insights into the Proba 3 mission and solar corona
(35:00) Exploring the link between Earth's magnetism and oxygen
For commercial-free versions of Space Nuts, join us on Patreon, Supercast, Apple Podcasts, or become a supporter here: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support


00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Heidi Campo: Welcome back to another exciting episode of

00:00:02 --> 00:00:05 Space Nuns. I'm your host for this season,

00:00:06 --> 00:00:08 Heidi Campo. And joining us is Professor

00:00:08 --> 00:00:11 Fred. Watch it. Fred Watson,

00:00:11 --> 00:00:12 astronomer at large.

00:00:13 --> 00:00:16 Professor Fred Watson: Actually, that's quite a nice, uh. It's quite

00:00:16 --> 00:00:19 a nice epithet. It should be Fred watching,

00:00:19 --> 00:00:21 uh, because I watched the universe. Fred

00:00:21 --> 00:00:24 watching here loud and clear.

00:00:24 --> 00:00:27 Looking forward to speaking again, Heidi.

00:00:27 --> 00:00:30 Heidi Campo: We, uh. We, uh. We're off to a great start.

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32 No, that's. That is fun. We are. We are. We

00:00:32 --> 00:00:35 are all observers in this universe. And you

00:00:35 --> 00:00:37 are listening to space nuts.

00:00:37 --> 00:00:40 Generic: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

00:00:40 --> 00:00:43 10, 9. Uh, ignition

00:00:43 --> 00:00:43 sequence.

00:00:43 --> 00:00:45 Professor Fred Watson: Star space nuts.

00:00:45 --> 00:00:48 Generic: 5, 4, 3, 2. 1, 2, 3, 4,

00:00:48 --> 00:00:50 5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Space

00:00:50 --> 00:00:53 nuts. Astronauts report it feels good.

00:00:54 --> 00:00:57 Heidi Campo: Um, today we have some very interesting

00:00:57 --> 00:00:59 articles. Uh, we're. We're kind of kicking

00:00:59 --> 00:01:01 things off. It's a. It's kind of a mystery

00:01:01 --> 00:01:03 episode. I feel like this is a very, very

00:01:03 --> 00:01:06 detective heavy episode. We've

00:01:06 --> 00:01:09 got mysteries being solved,

00:01:09 --> 00:01:12 we have mysteries unsolved, and we have clues

00:01:12 --> 00:01:14 to mysteries. So our first

00:01:14 --> 00:01:17 article this week is we are talking about a

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20 mystery that, uh, might be

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23 solved. So this is, uh. We're looking

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26 at what this is, is the home address

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28 for some missing matter.

00:01:29 --> 00:01:31 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's right. Um, uh, it's a

00:01:31 --> 00:01:34 story that, um, I find really

00:01:34 --> 00:01:37 interesting because the

00:01:37 --> 00:01:39 groundwork for this work was laid down five

00:01:39 --> 00:01:41 years ago here in Australia,

00:01:42 --> 00:01:45 um, with, um, work that's

00:01:45 --> 00:01:47 been carried out on something you and I have

00:01:47 --> 00:01:49 spoken about before. Briefly.

00:01:50 --> 00:01:52 Uh. Briefly is the word, because we're

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54 talking here about fast radio bursts,

00:01:55 --> 00:01:58 uh, which are things that have only been

00:01:58 --> 00:02:00 known in the last. It's getting on for 20

00:02:00 --> 00:02:02 years now since the first observations were

00:02:02 --> 00:02:04 made. But, uh. But they're still

00:02:04 --> 00:02:07 relatively new in the

00:02:07 --> 00:02:10 armory that astronomers can bring to

00:02:10 --> 00:02:12 bear on the universe. And what they are

00:02:13 --> 00:02:16 is pretty well what the name says. They're

00:02:16 --> 00:02:19 bursts of radio radiation. These are detected

00:02:19 --> 00:02:21 with radio telescopes, not visible light

00:02:21 --> 00:02:23 telescopes. Uh, and they are.

00:02:24 --> 00:02:26 Fast, uh, is probably a misnomer. Uh,

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 short would be a better word. Uh,

00:02:29 --> 00:02:32 but they, uh. Because they only last for

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34 typically a millionth of. Sorry, uh, a

00:02:34 --> 00:02:35 millisecond, a thousandth of a second,

00:02:35 --> 00:02:38 thereabouts, roughly. Often they've got

00:02:38 --> 00:02:40 structure in them as well, which is

00:02:40 --> 00:02:42 interesting when you look at the profile of

00:02:42 --> 00:02:44 the intensity of that millisecond

00:02:44 --> 00:02:47 burst spread out. If you can magnify the,

00:02:48 --> 00:02:50 uh, sort of time domain, you can see that

00:02:50 --> 00:02:52 there are features in that, uh, peaks and

00:02:52 --> 00:02:55 troughs, uh, squashed into that millisecond.

00:02:55 --> 00:02:58 So very, very fascinating

00:02:58 --> 00:03:01 objects. Their origin is still not

00:03:01 --> 00:03:04 certain. Um, I think the best

00:03:04 --> 00:03:07 guess of my colleagues who work on this kind

00:03:07 --> 00:03:10 of thing is that they are flares on

00:03:10 --> 00:03:12 magnetars. And magnetars are

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15 highly magnetized neutron stars.

00:03:15 --> 00:03:18 And these things apparently are able

00:03:18 --> 00:03:21 to have flares on their surface which can be

00:03:21 --> 00:03:23 very intense. These radio bursts are very,

00:03:23 --> 00:03:26 very bright in the radio spectrum.

00:03:27 --> 00:03:29 So that's one thing.

00:03:29 --> 00:03:30 Heidi Campo: Real quick, Fred. I'm sorry.

00:03:30 --> 00:03:31 Professor Fred Watson: No worries.

00:03:31 --> 00:03:33 Heidi Campo: I have noticed, um, based on the questions

00:03:33 --> 00:03:35 lately, that we are getting a lot of new

00:03:35 --> 00:03:38 listeners lately. Can you, um, maybe

00:03:38 --> 00:03:40 specify to some of our newer listeners the

00:03:40 --> 00:03:43 difference between a neutron star and

00:03:43 --> 00:03:44 perhaps our star?

00:03:45 --> 00:03:48 Professor Fred Watson: I can, um. Yeah, sorry. That's a really good

00:03:48 --> 00:03:50 question and a really good point to make. Um,

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53 so, um, neutron stars are, uh,

00:03:54 --> 00:03:56 stars that have reached the end of

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 their life, their hydrogen fuel, which

00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 is what powers stars like our sun that's

00:04:02 --> 00:04:05 being powered by hydrogen fuel. As we speak.

00:04:06 --> 00:04:09 That fuel has run out on

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11 a neutron star. And

00:04:11 --> 00:04:14 the stars are really interesting because

00:04:14 --> 00:04:17 there's a constant battle going on between,

00:04:17 --> 00:04:20 uh, the radiation that is coming from

00:04:20 --> 00:04:22 these nuclear processes, which is pushing

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24 outwards, and gravity, which is pulling

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 inwards and trying to compress, uh, a star

00:04:27 --> 00:04:29 like the sun. So it achieves a balance

00:04:29 --> 00:04:32 between, uh, radiation and gravitation.

00:04:32 --> 00:04:35 And so you can imagine what would happen if,

00:04:35 --> 00:04:38 at the end of a star's life, um, the

00:04:38 --> 00:04:41 radiation stops because the nuclear

00:04:41 --> 00:04:43 processes have actually changed. They don't

00:04:43 --> 00:04:45 stop, but they change. What's going to happen

00:04:45 --> 00:04:48 is gravitation wins and compresses, uh,

00:04:48 --> 00:04:50 the star down. And that, uh, sometimes

00:04:50 --> 00:04:53 happens explosively in the case of what we

00:04:53 --> 00:04:55 call a supernova, an exploding star. And so

00:04:55 --> 00:04:58 one possible remnant from such

00:04:58 --> 00:05:01 an event is a neutron star, uh,

00:05:01 --> 00:05:04 in which, uh, the thing

00:05:04 --> 00:05:07 has collapsed. And the only thing that's

00:05:07 --> 00:05:10 stopping that central core of

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14 the X star, the star that is now

00:05:14 --> 00:05:16 no longer a star. The only thing,

00:05:17 --> 00:05:19 um, that stops it collapsing completely to a

00:05:20 --> 00:05:22 black hole, uh, is the outward

00:05:22 --> 00:05:25 resistance of the neutrons within it.

00:05:25 --> 00:05:28 Um, and so those neutrons have an

00:05:28 --> 00:05:30 outward pressure, and that limits the

00:05:30 --> 00:05:33 collapse. Uh, so what you have is

00:05:33 --> 00:05:35 a star that used to be perhaps like our Sun.

00:05:35 --> 00:05:38 1.3. Probably more actually, in the case of a

00:05:38 --> 00:05:39 neutron star, because they're bigger than the

00:05:39 --> 00:05:41 sun anyway. 1.32

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44 million kilometers across. Suddenly, uh,

00:05:45 --> 00:05:47 it's collapsed to something, um, 10

00:05:47 --> 00:05:50 kilometers, 7 miles across,

00:05:50 --> 00:05:53 uh, but with incredibly high density.

00:05:54 --> 00:05:57 And all sorts of unusual phenomena take place

00:05:57 --> 00:05:58 in those stars. They are generally

00:05:58 --> 00:06:01 magnetized. Um, many of them

00:06:01 --> 00:06:04 squirt, um, beams of radiation out, um,

00:06:04 --> 00:06:06 and because they're rotating, those Beams

00:06:06 --> 00:06:08 have this sort of lighthouse effect that we

00:06:08 --> 00:06:11 see them flashing. Uh, but we believe

00:06:11 --> 00:06:14 as well some are so highly magnetized that

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16 they form a different species, though what

00:06:16 --> 00:06:18 are called magnetars. And apparently they

00:06:18 --> 00:06:21 have flares on them. Uh, and these flares are

00:06:21 --> 00:06:23 what we think gives rise to fast radio

00:06:23 --> 00:06:26 bursts. So that's

00:06:26 --> 00:06:28 where the science is. Uh,

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31 astronomers have been now observing these

00:06:31 --> 00:06:32 fast radio bursts for

00:06:34 --> 00:06:37 best part of a decade. Uh,

00:06:37 --> 00:06:39 and, uh, one or two of them repeat,

00:06:40 --> 00:06:42 which are a bit mysterious because it

00:06:42 --> 00:06:44 suggests that something's rotating because

00:06:44 --> 00:06:46 you get this repeating appearance of the

00:06:46 --> 00:06:49 burst. Uh, often though, they just come

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51 out of nowhere. Uh, and there are several

00:06:51 --> 00:06:53 radio telescopes in the world that are

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56 actively looking for these objects. One

00:06:56 --> 00:06:59 of them is down, uh, here in Australia,

00:07:00 --> 00:07:01 uh, the ascap, the Australian Square

00:07:01 --> 00:07:04 Kilometer Array Pathfinder. And that actually

00:07:04 --> 00:07:06 was one of the ones that contributed to the

00:07:06 --> 00:07:08 work that was carried out that I mentioned a

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 minute ago, uh, about five years ago.

00:07:11 --> 00:07:14 Um, in looking at how

00:07:14 --> 00:07:16 what these fast radio bursts might tell us

00:07:17 --> 00:07:20 about not just magnetars, but about

00:07:20 --> 00:07:22 the space through which the bursts of

00:07:22 --> 00:07:25 radiation travel. Because we now know

00:07:25 --> 00:07:28 that most of these radio bursts take place in

00:07:28 --> 00:07:30 very distant galaxies. They're galaxies that

00:07:30 --> 00:07:32 are, ah, you know, where distances are

00:07:32 --> 00:07:34 measured in billions of light years. They're

00:07:34 --> 00:07:37 a long, long way off. And so the radio

00:07:37 --> 00:07:40 bursts have traveled through a lot of empty

00:07:40 --> 00:07:43 space. Apparently empty. Um,

00:07:43 --> 00:07:46 and so I'm getting near the story here.

00:07:46 --> 00:07:48 This is the introduction to the story. We're

00:07:48 --> 00:07:51 nearly there. Um, what we

00:07:51 --> 00:07:54 find with fast radio bursts is that the

00:07:54 --> 00:07:57 bursts are, ah, um, dispersed.

00:07:57 --> 00:08:00 That's the technical term, which is a little

00:08:00 --> 00:08:03 bit like the way a prism breaks up the light

00:08:03 --> 00:08:06 of the sun or a white light into a

00:08:06 --> 00:08:09 spectrum, spectrum of colors. The same

00:08:09 --> 00:08:12 sort of thing happens as radio waves travel

00:08:12 --> 00:08:14 through space. You've got this spike of

00:08:14 --> 00:08:17 radiation, but as it goes through space,

00:08:17 --> 00:08:20 this dispersion phenomenon takes place. And

00:08:20 --> 00:08:23 the result is, uh, that the different

00:08:23 --> 00:08:26 frequencies are spread out in time. So,

00:08:26 --> 00:08:28 um, if I remember rightly, I'm not a radio

00:08:28 --> 00:08:31 astronomer, the, um,

00:08:32 --> 00:08:34 short wave, the higher frequencies arrive

00:08:34 --> 00:08:37 before the lower frequencies. Is that right?

00:08:37 --> 00:08:40 I think that's right. Yes, it is. Um,

00:08:40 --> 00:08:43 and the high frequencies are high first. But

00:08:43 --> 00:08:45 this burst, um, in different frequencies,

00:08:45 --> 00:08:48 it's still a spike of radiation. But you're

00:08:48 --> 00:08:50 now looking at almost like you've dispersed

00:08:50 --> 00:08:51 it into a spectrum.

00:08:51 --> 00:08:53 You're looking at different frequencies.

00:08:54 --> 00:08:57 And so the lower frequencies arrive later.

00:08:57 --> 00:08:59 Now that tells you

00:09:00 --> 00:09:03 something about the space that the

00:09:03 --> 00:09:05 radio waves have been traveling through.

00:09:05 --> 00:09:06 Because there is what we call the

00:09:06 --> 00:09:09 intergalactic medium. Uh, and

00:09:09 --> 00:09:11 that is basically a very

00:09:11 --> 00:09:14 rarefied, um, gas, if

00:09:14 --> 00:09:16 you like. Although you're talking about one

00:09:16 --> 00:09:19 atom per cubic meter or thereabouts. It's

00:09:19 --> 00:09:22 that sort of rarefaction. Uh,

00:09:22 --> 00:09:23 but there's enough of it. Because you're

00:09:23 --> 00:09:25 coming through these great distances. There's

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28 enough of that gas to have the effect of

00:09:28 --> 00:09:31 dispersing this radiation. So the amount of

00:09:31 --> 00:09:33 dispersion tells you how much

00:09:33 --> 00:09:36 gas there is. That the radio waves have

00:09:36 --> 00:09:38 traveled through. And that was the

00:09:38 --> 00:09:41 breakthrough made about five years ago. By a

00:09:41 --> 00:09:44 team of Australian scientists. Led by

00:09:45 --> 00:09:47 a, um, fantastic young gentleman called

00:09:47 --> 00:09:50 J.P. marchant. I think it was Jean Pierre,

00:09:51 --> 00:09:54 um, uh. A wonderful radio

00:09:54 --> 00:09:56 astronomer in Western Australia. A young man,

00:09:57 --> 00:10:00 uh, two weeks after this breakthrough paper

00:10:00 --> 00:10:03 had been, uh, released, he died.

00:10:04 --> 00:10:06 Uh, an absolute tragedy, this huge

00:10:06 --> 00:10:09 breakthrough. Yeah. And uh, I think he had a

00:10:09 --> 00:10:11 heart attack, if I remember rightly.

00:10:11 --> 00:10:12 Heidi Campo: It, uh, was probably the paper.

00:10:13 --> 00:10:15 Professor Fred Watson: Whatever it was, um, it was.

00:10:16 --> 00:10:18 It absolutely rocked the Australian

00:10:18 --> 00:10:21 astronomical community. This new knowledge

00:10:21 --> 00:10:23 that had been created. And he was the lead

00:10:23 --> 00:10:25 author on the paper. Sadly, he died.

00:10:26 --> 00:10:29 Um, however, that work has now been

00:10:29 --> 00:10:30 carried on at other

00:10:31 --> 00:10:33 radio astronomy observatories.

00:10:33 --> 00:10:36 Which brings us to the story today. And

00:10:36 --> 00:10:39 this is a paper that has been released, um,

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41 by astronomers at the center for

00:10:41 --> 00:10:44 Astrophysics, uh, the Harvard

00:10:44 --> 00:10:47 Smithsonian center for Astrophysics, cfa. Uh,

00:10:47 --> 00:10:49 and what they've done is they've taken this

00:10:49 --> 00:10:51 work a step further. Because they've looked

00:10:51 --> 00:10:53 at many, many more fast radio bursts. As

00:10:53 --> 00:10:56 you'd expect, these things are coming, um,

00:10:56 --> 00:10:59 um, um, are being constantly observed.

00:10:59 --> 00:11:02 Um, and what they've done is they have

00:11:02 --> 00:11:05 looked again at, uh. The structure

00:11:06 --> 00:11:08 or the constituents of the

00:11:08 --> 00:11:10 intergalactic medium. The space between the

00:11:10 --> 00:11:13 galaxies. And exactly as the Maaschant,

00:11:14 --> 00:11:17 uh, uh, uh, work. Um, proposed

00:11:17 --> 00:11:20 five years ago. They're able to use this

00:11:21 --> 00:11:23 as a measure of just what the.

00:11:23 --> 00:11:26 What the contents of the intergalactic

00:11:26 --> 00:11:29 medium are. Ah, and they find that it

00:11:29 --> 00:11:32 is enough to account for what

00:11:32 --> 00:11:34 we call the missing matter. Now, this is not

00:11:34 --> 00:11:36 dark matter that we're talking about. This is

00:11:36 --> 00:11:38 normal matter. Um, protons,

00:11:38 --> 00:11:41 electrons. The normal stuff which we are

00:11:41 --> 00:11:43 familiar with. Which in fact, uh. Is only

00:11:44 --> 00:11:47 something like 20% of the amount of matter in

00:11:47 --> 00:11:49 the universe. The rest of it is the dark

00:11:49 --> 00:11:52 matter. That's something else. But even that

00:11:52 --> 00:11:54 normal matter that we know about. When we

00:11:54 --> 00:11:56 look at the calculations as to what should

00:11:56 --> 00:11:59 emerge from the Big Bang. The um, event in

00:11:59 --> 00:12:02 which the universe was formed, we can't find

00:12:02 --> 00:12:04 enough of it. That's why we call it the

00:12:04 --> 00:12:07 missing matter. But it now Turns out

00:12:07 --> 00:12:09 that this combined set of

00:12:09 --> 00:12:12 researchers looking at the intergalactic

00:12:12 --> 00:12:14 medium find that there is enough matter in

00:12:14 --> 00:12:17 the intergalactic medium to account for that

00:12:17 --> 00:12:20 missing matter. So this is a problem solved.

00:12:20 --> 00:12:23 As you said at the beginning. Yeah, the two

00:12:23 --> 00:12:25 things absolutely dovetail together. The

00:12:25 --> 00:12:27 predicted amount of matter in the universe is

00:12:27 --> 00:12:30 now exactly what we find when we include

00:12:30 --> 00:12:33 this intergalactic medium. So it's

00:12:33 --> 00:12:36 amazing research. It's, um, very fitting

00:12:36 --> 00:12:37 that it should be our lead story on this

00:12:37 --> 00:12:40 edition of Space Nuts, because, um, as I

00:12:40 --> 00:12:42 said, it's got an Australian content. The

00:12:42 --> 00:12:44 thrusters now moved to other observatories,

00:12:44 --> 00:12:47 but we have this global picture now, uh,

00:12:47 --> 00:12:50 of what dark matter can tell us. Sorry, what,

00:12:50 --> 00:12:53 uh, fast radio burst can tell us about. Not

00:12:53 --> 00:12:55 dark matter, but the missing matter of the

00:12:55 --> 00:12:55 universe.

00:12:56 --> 00:12:59 Heidi Campo: Oh, that's wonderful. Uh, this reminds me

00:12:59 --> 00:13:01 when I'm trying to do math unsuccessfully,

00:13:01 --> 00:13:03 and I'm trying to find why I can't get the

00:13:03 --> 00:13:05 right answer and I forgot to carry the one.

00:13:05 --> 00:13:08 It turns out it was there the whole time. The

00:13:08 --> 00:13:11 answer was right there. I just forgot to grab

00:13:11 --> 00:13:13 that one little piece to pull it in to get

00:13:13 --> 00:13:16 the correct answer. But they solved such a

00:13:16 --> 00:13:19 complex, uh, problem. And isn't

00:13:19 --> 00:13:21 that kind of funny sometimes the answers are

00:13:21 --> 00:13:22 right there in plain sight.

00:13:22 --> 00:13:24 Professor Fred Watson: Exactly. It's in plain sight.

00:13:25 --> 00:13:27 Heidi Campo: But it's like you said, one atom per.

00:13:28 --> 00:13:29 What did you say it was?

00:13:29 --> 00:13:32 Professor Fred Watson: 1 cubic meter? It's something like that. It's

00:13:32 --> 00:13:34 that kind of level. It's very. A few atoms

00:13:34 --> 00:13:37 per cubic meter, perhaps. Um, but yes,

00:13:37 --> 00:13:40 uh, it's in plain sight. But you need.

00:13:41 --> 00:13:43 The thing that's made this possible, this

00:13:43 --> 00:13:45 detection possible is the fact that these

00:13:45 --> 00:13:47 bursts of radiation are so short,

00:13:48 --> 00:13:50 they're milliseconds. And that means that as

00:13:50 --> 00:13:52 they're dispersed, uh, into different

00:13:52 --> 00:13:54 frequency bands as they pass through the,

00:13:55 --> 00:13:57 the, the universe, um, you still can, you can

00:13:57 --> 00:14:00 detect this dispersion of the frequency

00:14:00 --> 00:14:02 bands, whereas with a constant radio signal,

00:14:02 --> 00:14:04 you wouldn't, you wouldn't do that. Um, you

00:14:04 --> 00:14:07 know that you've just got us radiation

00:14:07 --> 00:14:09 coming all the time. There's nothing to tell

00:14:09 --> 00:14:12 you whether the, whether the, um,

00:14:12 --> 00:14:14 lower frequencies are slower than the faster

00:14:14 --> 00:14:16 frequencies. There's nothing to tell you

00:14:16 --> 00:14:18 that. Yeah.

00:14:19 --> 00:14:20 Wonderful detective work. Yeah.

00:14:21 --> 00:14:22 Heidi Campo: Oh, yeah, it's fantastic.

00:14:22 --> 00:14:25 So by these radio, uh, astronomers then.

00:14:26 --> 00:14:29 So they do radio astronomy. What is your

00:14:29 --> 00:14:31 specialty? And then if you're not. So I also,

00:14:31 --> 00:14:33 I also, I have to make a joke, you know, it's

00:14:33 --> 00:14:34 not Space nuts if there's not a few dad

00:14:34 --> 00:14:37 jokes. And I've Been. I have not been holding

00:14:37 --> 00:14:40 up my end of, um, filling Andrew's shoes. So

00:14:40 --> 00:14:42 you may not be a radio astronomer, but

00:14:42 --> 00:14:43 technically you are an astronomer on the

00:14:43 --> 00:14:44 radio.

00:14:45 --> 00:14:48 Professor Fred Watson: That's correct. Yeah. I like it. I

00:14:48 --> 00:14:50 like it. Yes. Your dad jokes will go far,

00:14:50 --> 00:14:53 Heidi. Um, uh, so

00:14:53 --> 00:14:56 my specialty, um, and

00:14:56 --> 00:14:59 really my work now is in sort of policy and

00:14:59 --> 00:15:01 things of that sort rather than observing.

00:15:02 --> 00:15:05 Uh, but yes, for 40 years I guess

00:15:05 --> 00:15:07 I was, um, in fact more than that, nearly 50

00:15:07 --> 00:15:09 years, I was an optical astronomer. And that

00:15:09 --> 00:15:12 means I use telescopes that look at visible

00:15:12 --> 00:15:15 light, um, so giant telescopes

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17 that have a very shiny mirror at the

00:15:17 --> 00:15:19 base of them. In fact, the one I used

00:15:19 --> 00:15:21 principally was the, um, 3.9 meter

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25 Anglo Australian Telescope, uh, which we

00:15:25 --> 00:15:27 celebrated the 50th birthday on last year.

00:15:27 --> 00:15:30 Heidi Campo: Oh, happy, happy birthday, telescope.

00:15:32 --> 00:15:34 Professor Fred Watson: 0G and I feel fine space

00:15:34 --> 00:15:35 nuts.

00:15:35 --> 00:15:38 Heidi Campo: So with the, uh, ESA's Probe 3

00:15:38 --> 00:15:40 mission, that telescope, would that count as

00:15:40 --> 00:15:42 a big mirror telescope?

00:15:42 --> 00:15:45 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, um, it's a small mirror telescope.

00:15:46 --> 00:15:46 Heidi Campo: Okay.

00:15:46 --> 00:15:49 Professor Fred Watson: Um, but it is an optical telescope. That's

00:15:49 --> 00:15:51 right. So it's looking at visible light and

00:15:51 --> 00:15:53 lovely, uh, segment segue there to the next

00:15:53 --> 00:15:56 story, Heidi. Um, so this

00:15:56 --> 00:15:58 again, you know, needs a little bit of

00:15:58 --> 00:16:01 background to, uh, get over its

00:16:01 --> 00:16:03 significance. But this, I think is a

00:16:03 --> 00:16:05 fantastic story, uh, because,

00:16:06 --> 00:16:09 um, it kind of means, um, that

00:16:09 --> 00:16:11 you can make an eclipse of the sun anytime

00:16:11 --> 00:16:13 you like. Uh, as you know,

00:16:13 --> 00:16:15 eclipses, ah, are rare.

00:16:16 --> 00:16:19 Um, well, in any given place on the Earth,

00:16:19 --> 00:16:22 they're a rare phenomenon. Uh, that's to say

00:16:22 --> 00:16:24 when the moon exactly blots out the

00:16:24 --> 00:16:27 disk of the sun or blacks it out. Uh, that

00:16:27 --> 00:16:29 means the Moon's shadow on the Earth's, uh,

00:16:29 --> 00:16:32 surface passes over different

00:16:32 --> 00:16:35 places. Uh, we call it the path of

00:16:35 --> 00:16:37 totality because that's where you see a total

00:16:37 --> 00:16:40 eclipse. And that's only narrow. It's only 50

00:16:40 --> 00:16:43 to 100 kilometers wide, um, 30 to

00:16:43 --> 00:16:46 60 miles, I guess, something like that. So,

00:16:46 --> 00:16:47 uh, um,

00:16:48 --> 00:16:51 ah, it's a rare phenomenon at any one place.

00:16:51 --> 00:16:54 And that's why, uh, when eclipses come along,

00:16:54 --> 00:16:56 people chase all over the world. Uh,

00:16:56 --> 00:16:59 everybody here in Australia, or certainly the

00:16:59 --> 00:17:01 state I'm in, New South Wales, are, uh,

00:17:01 --> 00:17:04 looking forward to July 2028, when an

00:17:04 --> 00:17:07 eclipse, um, will be seen from this

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09 state. And in fact, the Moon's shadow will

00:17:09 --> 00:17:12 pass directly over Sydney. So Sydney's going

00:17:12 --> 00:17:14 to be the center of the world's astronomers

00:17:15 --> 00:17:17 for, um, a short time. In

00:17:17 --> 00:17:20 2028 it is already, of course, but, uh, in a

00:17:20 --> 00:17:22 different sort of way. Anyway. One of the

00:17:22 --> 00:17:25 reasons why scientists Asked

00:17:25 --> 00:17:28 so keen on watching eclipses is

00:17:28 --> 00:17:31 because when the moon's disk blots out the

00:17:31 --> 00:17:34 visible disk of the sun, what you see

00:17:34 --> 00:17:37 is the sun's outer atmosphere. It's corona.

00:17:37 --> 00:17:40 And, uh, this is a, it's a almost

00:17:40 --> 00:17:43 ethereal glow around the sun

00:17:43 --> 00:17:45 which has got structure in it that comes from

00:17:45 --> 00:17:48 the magnetic field of the sun, uh, that

00:17:48 --> 00:17:50 dictates what the corona looks like. There

00:17:50 --> 00:17:53 are many mysteries, uh, that we don't

00:17:53 --> 00:17:55 understand about the corona. One is why its

00:17:55 --> 00:17:58 temperature is so high. Uh, the

00:17:58 --> 00:18:00 sun's surface temperature, around

00:18:01 --> 00:18:04 5 degrees. This

00:18:04 --> 00:18:07 is degrees Celsius, the temperature of the

00:18:07 --> 00:18:09 corona, about 15 million degrees.

00:18:10 --> 00:18:13 Um, you're talking about this huge difference

00:18:13 --> 00:18:15 between the bit that we can

00:18:15 --> 00:18:18 see and the bit that is invisible

00:18:18 --> 00:18:21 except when you have an eclipse.

00:18:22 --> 00:18:24 That's because it's very faint compared with,

00:18:24 --> 00:18:27 you know, with the disk of the sun. Uh, and

00:18:27 --> 00:18:29 the mystery is, why is the corona so hot?

00:18:29 --> 00:18:31 So, uh, the corona. And it's thought to be.

00:18:32 --> 00:18:33 We actually think it's all about magnetic

00:18:33 --> 00:18:36 fields again. Anyway, the corona is an

00:18:36 --> 00:18:39 interesting area of study, but you

00:18:39 --> 00:18:41 can't see it unless you're in an eclipse.

00:18:42 --> 00:18:44 Now the problem, you might think, okay, well,

00:18:44 --> 00:18:46 why don't we make a telescope with a little

00:18:46 --> 00:18:49 disk that blots out the light of the sun so

00:18:49 --> 00:18:51 that you can see the corona around it. And

00:18:51 --> 00:18:53 there are such telescopes, they're called

00:18:53 --> 00:18:56 coronagraphs. That's the name,

00:18:56 --> 00:18:59 gives away what it's for. They only work

00:18:59 --> 00:19:02 where they really only work in a vacuum

00:19:02 --> 00:19:05 because the atmosphere tends to, um, scatter

00:19:05 --> 00:19:08 the light and blocks out the view of the

00:19:08 --> 00:19:11 corona. So one or two very high mountain

00:19:11 --> 00:19:13 sites have had coronagraphs used on them, and

00:19:13 --> 00:19:15 you can also use them in space. But

00:19:16 --> 00:19:18 they have their limitations.

00:19:18 --> 00:19:20 And this gets us to the story that you

00:19:20 --> 00:19:23 mentioned, Proba 3. This is actually two

00:19:23 --> 00:19:26 satellites which are operated by the European

00:19:26 --> 00:19:28 space agen. Um, and they are

00:19:29 --> 00:19:31 about, if I remember rightly, 150 meters

00:19:31 --> 00:19:34 apart. Uh, they are

00:19:34 --> 00:19:37 arranged so that one has

00:19:37 --> 00:19:40 a sort of disk, one has got a

00:19:40 --> 00:19:42 disk on it. Um, it's disk shaped, if I can

00:19:42 --> 00:19:45 put it that way. And if you line that up with

00:19:45 --> 00:19:48 the sun as seen from the other

00:19:48 --> 00:19:50 spacecraft, which has a telescope on it,

00:19:50 --> 00:19:52 probably with a shiny mirror in there

00:19:52 --> 00:19:55 somewhere, um, and that lets you

00:19:55 --> 00:19:57 blot out the sun's disk. And it gives you

00:19:58 --> 00:20:01 the best view that we have outside

00:20:01 --> 00:20:03 a solar eclipse of the solar

00:20:03 --> 00:20:06 corona. Uh, and the reason why this is in the

00:20:06 --> 00:20:08 news at the moment is because we're just

00:20:08 --> 00:20:11 starting to see the first images from this

00:20:11 --> 00:20:13 Prober 3 mission. It's a European Space

00:20:13 --> 00:20:16 Agency mission, uh, and we can see

00:20:16 --> 00:20:19 the uh, corona, uh, of the sun

00:20:19 --> 00:20:21 in great detail, just as we would

00:20:21 --> 00:20:24 if we were watching an eclipse from the uh,

00:20:24 --> 00:20:27 Earth. Uh, and so this is a step

00:20:27 --> 00:20:30 forward. It's a new technology. Uh, it is

00:20:30 --> 00:20:33 going to allow us to monitor the Sun's corona

00:20:33 --> 00:20:36 um, in real time, uh, and for

00:20:36 --> 00:20:38 a long period. I think they're proposing, uh,

00:20:38 --> 00:20:41 is it 1000 hours of observing

00:20:41 --> 00:20:44 of the Sun? Yes, it will create about

00:20:44 --> 00:20:46 1 hours of images over its two year

00:20:46 --> 00:20:49 mission and anyone will be able to download

00:20:49 --> 00:20:52 the data. So it's a uh, really

00:20:52 --> 00:20:54 interesting step forward by the European

00:20:54 --> 00:20:56 Space Agency and the scientists who are

00:20:56 --> 00:20:59 working uh, on this piece, um, of equipment

00:20:59 --> 00:21:01 to let us see the Sun's corona over the next

00:21:01 --> 00:21:02 two years in great detail.

00:21:04 --> 00:21:06 Heidi Campo: It's fantastic. I'm looking at the images

00:21:06 --> 00:21:09 right now and I've got to say, um,

00:21:09 --> 00:21:12 some of you may get this reference. It looks

00:21:12 --> 00:21:15 just like the um, late 90s, early

00:21:15 --> 00:21:17 2000s Windows media player

00:21:18 --> 00:21:19 visualizers.

00:21:19 --> 00:21:20 Professor Fred Watson: Yes.

00:21:20 --> 00:21:23 Heidi Campo: Doesn't it? It's got such a,

00:21:23 --> 00:21:25 interesting hue to it. I feel like I could be

00:21:25 --> 00:21:28 listening to like early 2000s techno music

00:21:28 --> 00:21:29 with these images.

00:21:30 --> 00:21:32 Professor Fred Watson: We can probably provide that somewhere

00:21:33 --> 00:21:34 some space techno.

00:21:34 --> 00:21:37 Heidi Campo: My other question, since this will be um,

00:21:37 --> 00:21:40 available to the public, would this be a good

00:21:40 --> 00:21:42 opportunity for any citizen scientists

00:21:43 --> 00:21:45 to tap into and are there any programs that

00:21:45 --> 00:21:47 you know of that people may want to be paying

00:21:47 --> 00:21:49 attention to if they are interested in

00:21:49 --> 00:21:51 getting involved in citizen science?

00:21:51 --> 00:21:54 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's a great question. And um, you

00:21:54 --> 00:21:56 know there is a wonderful array of

00:21:56 --> 00:21:59 citizen science projects which are ah,

00:21:59 --> 00:22:01 related to astronomy, um,

00:22:03 --> 00:22:06 um, various ones. The zooniverse is the

00:22:06 --> 00:22:08 sort of, um, I guess you've probably heard of

00:22:08 --> 00:22:11 the zooniverse, which is a kind of cluster of

00:22:11 --> 00:22:14 citizen science projects, um,

00:22:14 --> 00:22:16 that um, brings to bear

00:22:18 --> 00:22:20 the resources of our citizen uh, science

00:22:20 --> 00:22:23 scientists, uh, to bear on astronomical

00:22:23 --> 00:22:26 data. And you can bet your life that there

00:22:26 --> 00:22:29 will be, I don't know, uh, particularly that

00:22:29 --> 00:22:31 this is the case, but you can bet your life

00:22:31 --> 00:22:33 that there will be people poring over these

00:22:33 --> 00:22:36 coronagraph Images from Probe 3 looking uh,

00:22:36 --> 00:22:39 to see what we might discover about the

00:22:39 --> 00:22:42 solar corona. Um, it is uh, I think it's

00:22:42 --> 00:22:45 a, uh, really, if I can put it this

00:22:45 --> 00:22:47 way, it's a project that is ripe for

00:22:47 --> 00:22:49 exploitation with citizen science.

00:22:50 --> 00:22:53 Heidi Campo: Yeah, and I'm such a, you guys have probably

00:22:53 --> 00:22:55 heard me talk about citizen science programs

00:22:55 --> 00:22:56 on here before because I'm such a big

00:22:56 --> 00:22:59 advocate for everybody getting involved

00:22:59 --> 00:23:02 Because I, uh, you know, don't save it for

00:23:02 --> 00:23:04 the brilliant people with the PhDs. We love

00:23:04 --> 00:23:07 you, Fred. You're wonderful. But if we can

00:23:07 --> 00:23:09 export some of this work to the whole pool of

00:23:09 --> 00:23:12 talent, and I've always learned this, the

00:23:12 --> 00:23:14 more I get involved in the space industry is

00:23:14 --> 00:23:17 don't let. Don't let you know, don't be the

00:23:17 --> 00:23:19 person to tell yourself, no, I can't do that.

00:23:19 --> 00:23:21 Let somebody else tell you. Just start

00:23:21 --> 00:23:24 pursuing it. If you're interested in it, get

00:23:24 --> 00:23:26 involved. There's so many opportunities and

00:23:26 --> 00:23:29 there's so much to learn. We still have

00:23:29 --> 00:23:32 more questions than we have answers. So there

00:23:32 --> 00:23:35 is absolutely. Here's a pun. Here's another

00:23:35 --> 00:23:37 pun. I'm. I got two for them today. There's

00:23:37 --> 00:23:40 space for you. There's space for you to get

00:23:40 --> 00:23:42 involved in space. We need your

00:23:42 --> 00:23:45 help. So citizen science program programs,

00:23:45 --> 00:23:48 um, are a fantastic way

00:23:48 --> 00:23:51 to get involved. And I think this is

00:23:51 --> 00:23:53 a little bit more of my bumpier segue. Unless

00:23:53 --> 00:23:54 you had something you wanted to say, Fred.

00:23:54 --> 00:23:57 Professor Fred Watson: No, no, I'm just a big fan of cities and

00:23:57 --> 00:23:59 science as well. I think it's fabulous what

00:23:59 --> 00:24:01 is achieved by that. Um, and I

00:24:01 --> 00:24:04 wholeheartedly agree with your comments

00:24:04 --> 00:24:06 there, Heidi, but, yeah, ah, I think you had

00:24:06 --> 00:24:07 a nice segue coming up there, which I

00:24:07 --> 00:24:09 probably ruined now.

00:24:09 --> 00:24:10 Heidi Campo: Oh, no, I think it was going to be a pretty

00:24:10 --> 00:24:13 bumpy one. So this is. Okay. Um, I will say

00:24:13 --> 00:24:16 I do know that actually, um, some.

00:24:16 --> 00:24:19 I remember because I got some, um,

00:24:19 --> 00:24:21 they called it the NASA TOPS program.

00:24:21 --> 00:24:24 TOPS Standard for something. Open science

00:24:24 --> 00:24:26 repository, something like that. But it's,

00:24:26 --> 00:24:29 um, it's just a casual certification

00:24:29 --> 00:24:31 that you can get online from. It's an

00:24:31 --> 00:24:33 official NASA thing that you can get and just

00:24:33 --> 00:24:35 put it on your LinkedIn. But they just talked

00:24:35 --> 00:24:37 about a lot of different citizen science

00:24:37 --> 00:24:40 programs. And I believe I remember reading,

00:24:40 --> 00:24:42 if I, If I read this correctly, a, um.

00:24:42 --> 00:24:45 Lot of breakthroughs have happened

00:24:45 --> 00:24:48 with hurricane technology and, um,

00:24:49 --> 00:24:51 early detection of hurricanes through citizen

00:24:51 --> 00:24:54 science. Because that was one of the first

00:24:55 --> 00:24:57 places that we tapped into citizen science.

00:24:58 --> 00:25:00 Don't quote me on the decades. I'm terrible

00:25:00 --> 00:25:01 at my history. But the first,

00:25:02 --> 00:25:05 um, cited use of citizen

00:25:05 --> 00:25:08 science was the former

00:25:08 --> 00:25:11 belief was that wind

00:25:11 --> 00:25:14 always moved one direction because if you're

00:25:14 --> 00:25:15 standing in the wind, it's coming at you one

00:25:15 --> 00:25:18 direction. And this guy was the I. And I. I

00:25:18 --> 00:25:20 wish I had his name. I'm so sorry. But he was

00:25:20 --> 00:25:23 like, hey, I think wind moves in different

00:25:23 --> 00:25:26 patterns. And so what he did is he,

00:25:26 --> 00:25:28 um, had a weather event and he had People

00:25:28 --> 00:25:31 posted all over the place and

00:25:31 --> 00:25:33 he's like, tell me which direction the wind

00:25:33 --> 00:25:36 was moving. And they reported back to him

00:25:36 --> 00:25:39 and he discovered that yes, the

00:25:39 --> 00:25:41 weather was not always. The wind was not

00:25:41 --> 00:25:43 always moving one direction. So that was uh.

00:25:43 --> 00:25:44 I don't know if you know more about that

00:25:44 --> 00:25:44 story.

00:25:44 --> 00:25:47 Professor Fred Watson: I don't know that but that exactly. It's uh,

00:25:47 --> 00:25:50 you know, it, that's. It's wonderful when

00:25:50 --> 00:25:53 people have an idea like that and managed to

00:25:53 --> 00:25:55 muster the resources that um, he clearly did

00:25:55 --> 00:25:58 and get the results. And citizen science is a

00:25:58 --> 00:25:59 lot like that.

00:26:01 --> 00:26:03 Okay, we checked all four systems and.

00:26:03 --> 00:26:05 Heidi Campo: Team with a go space navigation. Yeah.

00:26:06 --> 00:26:09 So here's my bumpy segue to the last

00:26:09 --> 00:26:11 article. Um, I guess we can say if we're

00:26:11 --> 00:26:13 keeping it with the detective, uh, metaphor

00:26:13 --> 00:26:16 for this episode is this is a clue. So we

00:26:16 --> 00:26:19 had the first story was we've

00:26:19 --> 00:26:22 solved something. The second one is we have

00:26:22 --> 00:26:24 um. Well I guess the second one was the clue.

00:26:24 --> 00:26:27 And this last one is there is a mystery. This

00:26:27 --> 00:26:30 is a open case yet to be solved, which

00:26:30 --> 00:26:33 is a mysterious link between

00:26:33 --> 00:26:35 Earth's magnetism and

00:26:35 --> 00:26:38 oxygen. So this is an open

00:26:38 --> 00:26:40 mystery. We don't know the answers.

00:26:40 --> 00:26:43 Professor Fred Watson: We don't uh, um. And it

00:26:43 --> 00:26:45 is um, really quite a significant

00:26:46 --> 00:26:48 result Heidi, that um,

00:26:49 --> 00:26:52 uh, has come from scientists. Actually

00:26:52 --> 00:26:54 One of them is at my alma mater, the

00:26:54 --> 00:26:55 University of St. Andrews in Scotland,

00:26:55 --> 00:26:58 Scotland's oldest university, founded in

00:26:58 --> 00:27:01 1413. I was there shortly afterwards, as I

00:27:01 --> 00:27:04 always tell people. Um, um. It's

00:27:04 --> 00:27:07 uh, the university uh, of um, of St.

00:27:07 --> 00:27:09 Andrews and also uh, scientists at the

00:27:09 --> 00:27:11 University of leed. So this is work in the

00:27:11 --> 00:27:13 uk. Um, the

00:27:14 --> 00:27:17 story is uh,

00:27:17 --> 00:27:20 basically uh, that we have

00:27:20 --> 00:27:22 this trend, uh, that is

00:27:22 --> 00:27:24 detectable um

00:27:25 --> 00:27:28 by techniques that

00:27:28 --> 00:27:31 are uh, quite um,

00:27:32 --> 00:27:34 remote from what we do in the world of

00:27:34 --> 00:27:37 astronomy. Uh, it's um,

00:27:37 --> 00:27:37 what was it?

00:27:39 --> 00:27:42 Biogeochemistry I think was one of them.

00:27:42 --> 00:27:44 So what scientists have looked at,

00:27:45 --> 00:27:48 uh, what you might call proxies,

00:27:48 --> 00:27:51 uh, um, things that tell you

00:27:51 --> 00:27:54 about something else. And uh, for

00:27:54 --> 00:27:57 example one of the examples is this, uh,

00:27:57 --> 00:28:00 if you look back through the geological

00:28:00 --> 00:28:02 record you can find evidence

00:28:03 --> 00:28:05 in the geological strata of

00:28:05 --> 00:28:08 periods where there were lots and lots of

00:28:08 --> 00:28:11 wildfires, um, what we call bushfires here in

00:28:11 --> 00:28:14 Australia, forest fires elsewhere.

00:28:14 --> 00:28:17 So you can find evidence of that. And

00:28:17 --> 00:28:20 the scientists are saying that is a proxy

00:28:20 --> 00:28:23 for the number of these wildfires, is a

00:28:23 --> 00:28:25 proxy for the amount of oxygen that was in

00:28:25 --> 00:28:28 the atmosphere at the time. Because

00:28:28 --> 00:28:31 uh, wildfires spread much more readily

00:28:31 --> 00:28:33 if you've got an oxygen rich atmosphere than

00:28:33 --> 00:28:35 they do if you've got less.

00:28:35 --> 00:28:36 Heidi Campo: Oh, interesting.

00:28:36 --> 00:28:39 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. So it's that kind of work that's been

00:28:39 --> 00:28:42 done. Also, um,

00:28:42 --> 00:28:44 something that's a little bit more directly

00:28:44 --> 00:28:47 measurable, uh, is the history of

00:28:47 --> 00:28:49 the Earth's magnetic field. And that's one of

00:28:49 --> 00:28:51 the ways that we know that the Earth's

00:28:51 --> 00:28:54 magnetic poles reverse every, probably

00:28:54 --> 00:28:56 three or four times every million years,

00:28:56 --> 00:28:58 something like that. Uh, so the, the

00:28:58 --> 00:29:00 magnetic field of the Earth is something that

00:29:00 --> 00:29:03 we can get from the alignment of grains

00:29:03 --> 00:29:05 of crystals in rocks. Um,

00:29:05 --> 00:29:08 and that tells you, you know, how well these

00:29:08 --> 00:29:10 are aligned, tells you about the intensity of

00:29:10 --> 00:29:13 the magnetic field. Excuse me. So

00:29:14 --> 00:29:16 this group of scientists. Sorry, I've got,

00:29:17 --> 00:29:19 uh, an oxygen rich, uh, throat at the moment.

00:29:19 --> 00:29:22 It's wanting to come. So these groups of

00:29:22 --> 00:29:24 scientists have looked at something that

00:29:24 --> 00:29:27 nobody would have expected, uh, to

00:29:27 --> 00:29:30 correlate, but they find that

00:29:30 --> 00:29:32 there is a correlation between,

00:29:33 --> 00:29:35 and this is looking back over half a billion

00:29:35 --> 00:29:38 years. So they're looking back in time over

00:29:38 --> 00:29:41 500 million years. When you plot the strength

00:29:41 --> 00:29:43 of the Earth's, uh, magnetic field over that

00:29:43 --> 00:29:46 period and compare it with the

00:29:46 --> 00:29:49 amount of oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere

00:29:49 --> 00:29:52 over that period, the two graphs match

00:29:52 --> 00:29:55 very, very closely. Um, there's

00:29:55 --> 00:29:58 clearly a link, uh, between the

00:29:58 --> 00:30:00 amount of oxygen in the atmosphere, the

00:30:00 --> 00:30:02 intensity of the magnetic field.

00:30:03 --> 00:30:05 The mystery is,

00:30:06 --> 00:30:09 is that link telling you that

00:30:09 --> 00:30:12 more magnetism means more oxygen and,

00:30:12 --> 00:30:14 or more oxygen means more magnetism?

00:30:14 --> 00:30:16 Or is it telling you that there is something

00:30:16 --> 00:30:19 else going on that affects both the magnetic

00:30:19 --> 00:30:22 field and the oxygen as well, and

00:30:23 --> 00:30:25 affects them both in the same way? So some

00:30:25 --> 00:30:28 other process that we don't really understand

00:30:28 --> 00:30:31 yet. So a really big mystery, but

00:30:31 --> 00:30:34 the reason why I'm mentioning this on, um,

00:30:34 --> 00:30:36 space knots is that it feeds into

00:30:36 --> 00:30:39 our understanding of what might,

00:30:40 --> 00:30:42 uh, constitute places where life evolves

00:30:42 --> 00:30:44 elsewhere in the universe. Because we know,

00:30:45 --> 00:30:47 ah, most of the oxygen in the Earth's

00:30:47 --> 00:30:49 atmosphere actually comes from biological

00:30:49 --> 00:30:52 processes. It's what we call a biomarker.

00:30:52 --> 00:30:53 Somebody looking at the Earth from outside

00:30:54 --> 00:30:56 and seeing that much oxygen,

00:30:57 --> 00:31:00 uh, if they have life of the same

00:31:00 --> 00:31:01 kind that we have, they could say, yes,

00:31:01 --> 00:31:04 that's a biomarker that is marking, uh.

00:31:04 --> 00:31:06 Heidi Campo: Similar to K2 18B, right?

00:31:06 --> 00:31:09 Professor Fred Watson: Exactly. That's right. Although

00:31:09 --> 00:31:12 it was, uh, what was it? Dimethyl

00:31:12 --> 00:31:15 sulfide was the biomarker that was

00:31:15 --> 00:31:17 caused for the exoplanet

00:31:17 --> 00:31:20 K2.18b, which is still of great

00:31:20 --> 00:31:22 interest to astrobiologists. We don't really

00:31:22 --> 00:31:25 know first of all whether that, uh,

00:31:25 --> 00:31:28 um, finding of dimethyl sulfide is real.

00:31:28 --> 00:31:31 Or whether it's being confused with some

00:31:31 --> 00:31:34 other molecule. The signature in the spectrum

00:31:34 --> 00:31:36 that the James Webb telescope took, um, and

00:31:36 --> 00:31:38 we don't actually know whether that is

00:31:38 --> 00:31:41 genuinely a biomarker in

00:31:41 --> 00:31:43 an environment different from the Earth's. So

00:31:43 --> 00:31:46 lots of questions attached to that too. But

00:31:47 --> 00:31:49 this new finding, the link between magnetism

00:31:49 --> 00:31:52 and oxygen, whatever causes it,

00:31:52 --> 00:31:55 uh, may be something that will feed into

00:31:56 --> 00:31:58 the understanding of the way life processes

00:31:58 --> 00:32:01 work, uh, by astrobiologists and perhaps

00:32:01 --> 00:32:04 will tell us more about the kinds of places

00:32:04 --> 00:32:06 that we might look for extraterrestrial life,

00:32:07 --> 00:32:09 uh, when we get the next generation of giant

00:32:09 --> 00:32:12 telescopes with big shiny mirrors. Uh, and

00:32:12 --> 00:32:14 the biggest shiny mirror of all is going to

00:32:14 --> 00:32:16 be the European Extremely Large Telescope.

00:32:16 --> 00:32:19 Should come online in 2028. Its mirror is

00:32:19 --> 00:32:21 39 meters in diameter.

00:32:22 --> 00:32:24 It's huge. Anyway.

00:32:24 --> 00:32:27 Heidi Campo: Yeah, well, I mean, uh,

00:32:27 --> 00:32:29 this is, uh, important to consider. This is

00:32:29 --> 00:32:31 one of the first things they teach you

00:32:31 --> 00:32:33 anytime you go to any kind of, of STEM

00:32:33 --> 00:32:35 related program is okay.

00:32:35 --> 00:32:37 Correlation does not mean causation.

00:32:38 --> 00:32:38 Professor Fred Watson: Exactly.

00:32:38 --> 00:32:40 Heidi Campo: And you said this. I mean, it's like we don't

00:32:40 --> 00:32:43 know if it's this, this, or this. And,

00:32:43 --> 00:32:46 and it's. I mean, I'm looking at the trend

00:32:46 --> 00:32:47 lines right now. I mean, they are

00:32:49 --> 00:32:51 right there. It's so easy to jump to the

00:32:51 --> 00:32:54 conclusion and say, yeah, these are so

00:32:54 --> 00:32:56 highly correlated. But then we just have to

00:32:56 --> 00:32:59 remind ourselves why. And we don't know. This

00:32:59 --> 00:32:59 one's a mystery.

00:33:00 --> 00:33:03 Professor Fred Watson: It's a mystery. And, um, well, I'm sure

00:33:03 --> 00:33:05 it will be the focus of a lot of really

00:33:05 --> 00:33:07 interesting research over the next year or

00:33:07 --> 00:33:10 two. Maybe Heidi, you and I'll talk about

00:33:10 --> 00:33:13 whatever they find in a Space Nuts down the

00:33:13 --> 00:33:15 track sometime. Uh, but yeah, we should,

00:33:15 --> 00:33:17 um, keep an eye on this one because it's a

00:33:17 --> 00:33:18 very exciting result.

00:33:20 --> 00:33:22 Heidi Campo: Well, I think that that is a good segue to

00:33:22 --> 00:33:24 kick it back to you, our listeners. We've

00:33:24 --> 00:33:26 talked about a lot of fun things,

00:33:27 --> 00:33:29 questions, answers, solutions, and more

00:33:29 --> 00:33:32 questions and citizen science in there. Um,

00:33:32 --> 00:33:34 I think we should just take this time to

00:33:34 --> 00:33:36 encourage you guys to stay involved because

00:33:36 --> 00:33:39 you can be a part of these breakthroughs.

00:33:39 --> 00:33:42 And then instead of writing in just simple

00:33:42 --> 00:33:44 questions here on SpaceNets, you can also

00:33:44 --> 00:33:47 say, hey, as a citizen scientist myself, I

00:33:47 --> 00:33:49 have discovered this. What do you think about

00:33:49 --> 00:33:51 these findings? And I think that would be

00:33:51 --> 00:33:53 really neat to hear those kinds of statements

00:33:53 --> 00:33:53 from you guys.

00:33:55 --> 00:33:56 Professor Fred Watson: Absolutely. We could then tell the world.

00:33:56 --> 00:33:59 Remember where you heard it first here on

00:33:59 --> 00:33:59 Space Nuts.

00:34:00 --> 00:34:03 Heidi Campo: What a perfect, perfect ending. Um, Fred,

00:34:03 --> 00:34:05 this has been such a fun conversation.

00:34:05 --> 00:34:08 Professor Fred Watson: Thank you so much My pleasure always, Heidi.

00:34:08 --> 00:34:09 And, uh, I look forward to talking to you

00:34:09 --> 00:34:10 next time.

00:34:11 --> 00:34:13 Voice Over Guy: You've been listening to the Space Nuts

00:34:13 --> 00:34:16 podcast, available at

00:34:16 --> 00:34:19 Apple Podcasts, Spotify, I Heart

00:34:19 --> 00:34:22 Radio, or your favorite podcast player. You

00:34:22 --> 00:34:23 can also stream on

00:34:23 --> 00:34:26 demand at bitesz.com This has been another

00:34:26 --> 00:34:28 quality podcast production from

00:34:28 --> 00:34:29 bitesz. com.