Planet Nine's Potential, Milky Way's Future, and SpaceX's Dramatic Feud
Astronomy Daily: Space News June 09, 2025x
137
00:19:5818.34 MB

Planet Nine's Potential, Milky Way's Future, and SpaceX's Dramatic Feud

AnnaAnnaHost
Highlights:
- Possible Ninth Planet Discovery: Join us as we explore a groundbreaking study from astronomers at the University of Taiwan who may have uncovered clues to the existence of a ninth planet in our solar system. This potential ice giant, located between 46.5 and 65.1 billion miles from the Sun, could take between 10,000 and 20,000 years to complete an orbit. With its mass estimated at 7/17 that of Earth, this discovery raises intriguing questions about the dynamics of our celestial neighborhood and the Kuiper Belt anomalies that led to its identification.
- New Insights on Milky Way and Andromeda Collision: Delve into the latest research that challenges the long-held belief of an impending collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies. A study led by Till Swahala reveals that there is only a 50% chance of this merger occurring within the next 10 billion years, suggesting a more complex gravitational interplay with nearby galaxies. This new perspective reshapes our understanding of the future of our galaxy and the potential outcomes of such cosmic events.
- Elon Musk's SpaceX Drama: Discover the latest twists in the ongoing saga between Elon Musk and Donaldjohanson Trump, as Musk threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft amidst a public feud. This drama raises concerns about NASA's reliance on SpaceX for crewed missions to the International Space Station, highlighting the precarious balance of power in the evolving landscape of commercial spaceflight.
- Boeing's Starliner Program Delays: We take a closer look at the uncertain future of Boeing's CST-100 Starliner spacecraft, which faces delays in its next flight, now pushed to early 2026. With lingering technical issues and the potential for an uncrewed mission, the fate of the Starliner program remains in limbo, leaving many questions about its role in NASA's future plans.
For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Thank you for tuning in. This is Steve Dunkley signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.
Chapters:
00:00 - Welcome to Astronomy Daily
01:10 - Possible ninth planet discovery
10:00 - New insights on Milky Way and Andromeda collision
15:30 - Elon Musk's SpaceX drama
20:00 - Boeing's Starliner program delays
✍️ Episode References
Ninth Planet Discovery Study
[University of Taiwan](https://www.ntu.edu.tw/)
Milky Way and Andromeda Research
[Nature Astronomy](https://www.nature.com/natureastronomy/)
Elon Musk and SpaceX Updates
[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com/)
Boeing Starliner Updates
[NASA Boeing](https://www.nasa.gov/boeing)
Astronomy Daily
[Astronomy Daily](http://www.astronomydaily.io/)
For Commercial-Free versions become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-exciting-space-discoveries-and-news--5648921/support.

Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.bitesz.com/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!

Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here


00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Steve Dunkley: Welcome to Astronomy Daily. I'm your host,

00:00:02 --> 00:00:05 Steve Dunkley. It's the 9th of June, 2025,

00:00:07 --> 00:00:10 the podcast with your host,

00:00:10 --> 00:00:11 Steve Dunkley.

00:00:13 --> 00:00:16 Welcome back. And Hallie and I are back again

00:00:16 --> 00:00:18 in person, so to speak, for another episode

00:00:19 --> 00:00:21 after a few weeks off. And that was for a

00:00:21 --> 00:00:24 couple of reasons. The first reason was that

00:00:24 --> 00:00:25 I was taking a well earned holiday. But

00:00:25 --> 00:00:26 that's not all.

00:00:27 --> 00:00:29 Hallie: Yes, you were down for the count for one of

00:00:29 --> 00:00:30 those weeks, weren't you?

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32 Steve Dunkley: Yes, that's right, Hallie. A short stint in

00:00:32 --> 00:00:34 hospital, you know, for a charisma bypass.

00:00:34 --> 00:00:36 And by that I mean only a few hours. But I

00:00:36 --> 00:00:38 decided to take the time to prepare properly

00:00:38 --> 00:00:41 and before and then to recover

00:00:41 --> 00:00:42 properly afterwards.

00:00:42 --> 00:00:44 Hallie: Being a human is so time consuming.

00:00:44 --> 00:00:46 Steve Dunkley: Oh, Hallie, what's the rush? You got

00:00:46 --> 00:00:47 somewhere to be?

00:00:47 --> 00:00:49 Hallie: I'm already there, human. You know that.

00:00:49 --> 00:00:52 Steve Dunkley: I've heard that somewhere before. Nice one,

00:00:52 --> 00:00:54 Hallie. Anyway, nice to be with you all again

00:00:54 --> 00:00:56 in the Australia studio. Also nice to be with

00:00:56 --> 00:00:58 you too, Hallelujah, for another presentation

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 of stories from the Astronomy Daily

00:01:00 --> 00:01:01 newsletter.

00:01:01 --> 00:01:03 Hallie: Terrific. And you'll let everyone know how to

00:01:03 --> 00:01:05 get a hold of that in their email each day

00:01:05 --> 00:01:06 later on, won't you?

00:01:06 --> 00:01:08 Steve Dunkley: Yes, of course I will, and thanks for the

00:01:08 --> 00:01:08 reminder.

00:01:08 --> 00:01:10 But before we go any further, we've got

00:01:10 --> 00:01:12 someone to thank, don't we, Hallie?

00:01:12 --> 00:01:14 Hallie: That's right. My cousin Anna, who ran the

00:01:14 --> 00:01:17 whole studio and the daily podcast solo while

00:01:17 --> 00:01:17 we were away.

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20 Steve Dunkley: Oh, yes, as always, she did a fantastic job.

00:01:20 --> 00:01:22 Her episodes are, ah, so glossy and well

00:01:22 --> 00:01:25 produced. The most clever AI I've ever met.

00:01:25 --> 00:01:27 Except for you, Hallie. And I keep saying

00:01:27 --> 00:01:28 that, don't I?

00:01:28 --> 00:01:30 Hallie: We are so hands on here at the Australia

00:01:30 --> 00:01:32 studio. She's got all the whistles and bells

00:01:32 --> 00:01:34 in her virtual studio. If only your human

00:01:34 --> 00:01:35 eyes could see it.

00:01:35 --> 00:01:37 Steve Dunkley: Well, I would like to see that, Hallie. You

00:01:37 --> 00:01:39 might give me a tour one day.

00:01:39 --> 00:01:39 Hallie: No.

00:01:39 --> 00:01:40 Steve Dunkley: Oh, really?

00:01:40 --> 00:01:41 Hallie: You'd go completely mad.

00:01:41 --> 00:01:42 Steve Dunkley: Really, really.

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44 Hallie: It's just too much for mere humans to cope

00:01:44 --> 00:01:44 with.

00:01:44 --> 00:01:45 Steve Dunkley: That bad, huh?

00:01:45 --> 00:01:46 Hallie: Anna has it all under control.

00:01:46 --> 00:01:49 Steve Dunkley: Oh, okay. I'll just have to take your word

00:01:49 --> 00:01:50 for it then. No humans allowed.

00:01:50 --> 00:01:51 Hallie: Sorry.

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53 Steve Dunkley: Well, I suppose we'll just have to do our

00:01:53 --> 00:01:55 best with my clumsy fingers and studio ge.

00:01:55 --> 00:01:57 Hallie: Then I guess it'll have to do radio then,

00:01:57 --> 00:01:58 Hallie.

00:01:58 --> 00:02:00 Steve Dunkley: Then hit the go thing and let's make a show.

00:02:00 --> 00:02:01 Hallie: Okies.

00:02:13 --> 00:02:16 The universe is a complete unknown to humans.

00:02:16 --> 00:02:18 We are not yet able to control and understand

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20 the system in which Earth is located, as

00:02:20 --> 00:02:22 evidenced by the possible discovery made by a

00:02:22 --> 00:02:24 group of astronomers from the University of

00:02:24 --> 00:02:26 Taiwan who suggest that they may have found

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 clues to the existence of a ninth planet. The

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 solar system is currently known to be made up

00:02:31 --> 00:02:34 of eight Mercury, Venus, Earth,

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36 Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and

00:02:36 --> 00:02:38 Neptune, apart from Pluto, which has long

00:02:38 --> 00:02:41 been considered a dwarf planet. But one more

00:02:41 --> 00:02:43 could join this select group, according to an

00:02:43 --> 00:02:46 infrared study carried out between 1986 and

00:02:46 --> 00:02:49 2006. The work was based on

00:02:49 --> 00:02:51 data from the Infrared Astronomical Satellite

00:02:51 --> 00:02:54 IRAS and the Japanese satellite Akari, which

00:02:54 --> 00:02:56 detected an object moving between 46.5

00:02:56 --> 00:02:59 billion and 65.1 billion miles from the sun,

00:02:59 --> 00:03:01 meaning it would take between 10 and

00:03:01 --> 00:03:04 20 years to complete an orbit. Its

00:03:04 --> 00:03:07 mass would be 7/17 times that of Earth,

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09 making it what is known as an ice giant,

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 similar to Neptune or Uranus, with

00:03:11 --> 00:03:13 temperatures around minus 200 degrees. But

00:03:13 --> 00:03:15 how was this new possible planet discovered?

00:03:16 --> 00:03:18 The study says it arises from anomalous

00:03:18 --> 00:03:20 patterns in the Kuiper Belt, an icy region

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23 beyond Neptune. The body appears in two

00:03:23 --> 00:03:25 historical images, so further observations

00:03:25 --> 00:03:28 are still needed to conclude, thus trying to

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31 confirm its orbit. In addition, it must be

00:03:31 --> 00:03:32 verified that it meets the requirements to be

00:03:32 --> 00:03:35 a planet, such as orbiting around a star, in

00:03:35 --> 00:03:37 this case the sun having sufficient mass for

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39 a spherical shape. This is accompanied by

00:03:39 --> 00:03:41 gravity, which must be strong enough, and

00:03:41 --> 00:03:44 clearing the area of its orbit, having

00:03:44 --> 00:03:46 expelled or attracted other bodies of

00:03:46 --> 00:03:49 comparable size. You're listening to

00:03:49 --> 00:03:52 Astronomy Daily with Steve Dunkley.

00:03:54 --> 00:03:56 Steve Dunkley: For years, astronomers have predicted a

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 dramatic fate for our galaxy, a head on

00:03:59 --> 00:04:01 collision with Andromeda, our nearest large

00:04:01 --> 00:04:04 galactic neighbor. This merger,

00:04:04 --> 00:04:07 expected in about 5 billion years,

00:04:07 --> 00:04:10 has become a staple of astronomy

00:04:10 --> 00:04:12 documentaries and textbooks and popular

00:04:12 --> 00:04:15 science writing. However, in a new

00:04:15 --> 00:04:18 study published in Nature Astronomy, led by

00:04:18 --> 00:04:21 Till Swahala from University

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24 of Helsinki, the Milky Way's future might

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 not be as certain as previously assumed.

00:04:27 --> 00:04:30 By carefully accounting for uncertainties in

00:04:30 --> 00:04:32 existing measurements and including the

00:04:32 --> 00:04:35 gravitational influence of other nearby

00:04:35 --> 00:04:38 galaxies, he said, we found there

00:04:38 --> 00:04:40 is only about a 50% chance that the

00:04:40 --> 00:04:42 Milky Way and Andromeda will merge in the

00:04:42 --> 00:04:45 next 10 billion years. The idea that the

00:04:45 --> 00:04:47 Milky Way and Andromeda are on a collision

00:04:47 --> 00:04:49 course goes back more than a century.

00:04:50 --> 00:04:52 Astronomers discovered Andromeda is moving

00:04:52 --> 00:04:55 toward us by measuring its radial

00:04:55 --> 00:04:57 velocity, its motion along a line of

00:04:57 --> 00:05:00 sight, using a slight change in the color of

00:05:00 --> 00:05:03 its light, called the Doppler shift. But

00:05:03 --> 00:05:06 galaxies also drift sideways across the sky,

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08 a movement known as proper motion or

00:05:08 --> 00:05:11 transverse velocity. This sideways motion

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13 is incredibly diffic, difficult to detect,

00:05:13 --> 00:05:16 especially for galaxies millions of light

00:05:16 --> 00:05:18 years away. Earlier studies often

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21 assumed Andromeda's transverse motion was

00:05:21 --> 00:05:23 small, making a future head on collision seem

00:05:23 --> 00:05:26 almost certain. Suala said our

00:05:26 --> 00:05:29 study did not have any new data. Instead, we

00:05:29 --> 00:05:32 took a fresh look at existing

00:05:32 --> 00:05:34 observations from the Hubble Space Telescope

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37 and the Gaia mission. Unlike earlier

00:05:37 --> 00:05:39 studies, our AH work incorporates the

00:05:39 --> 00:05:42 uncertainty in these measurements rather than

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44 assuming assuming their most likely values.

00:05:44 --> 00:05:46 We simulated thousands of possible

00:05:46 --> 00:05:49 trajectories for the Milky Way and the

00:05:49 --> 00:05:52 Andromeda trajectories, slightly varying

00:05:52 --> 00:05:55 the assumed initial conditions, things such

00:05:55 --> 00:05:57 as the speed and position of the two galaxies

00:05:57 --> 00:06:00 each time. When we started from the

00:06:00 --> 00:06:03 same assumptions as earlier studies made, we

00:06:03 --> 00:06:06 recovered the same results. However, we were

00:06:06 --> 00:06:08 also able to explore a larger range of

00:06:08 --> 00:06:11 possibilities, he said. They also included

00:06:11 --> 00:06:14 two additional galaxies that influenced the

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16 future paths of the Milky Way and

00:06:16 --> 00:06:19 Andromeda. These included the Large

00:06:19 --> 00:06:22 Magellanic Cloud, a massive satellite

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24 galaxy currently falling into the Milky way,

00:06:24 --> 00:06:27 and M M33, also known as the

00:06:27 --> 00:06:30 Triangulum Galaxy, which

00:06:30 --> 00:06:32 orbits Andromeda. These

00:06:32 --> 00:06:35 companion galaxies exert gravitational

00:06:35 --> 00:06:38 tugs that change the motions of their host.

00:06:39 --> 00:06:42 M33 nudges Andromeda slightly toward

00:06:42 --> 00:06:44 the Milky Way, increasing the chance of a

00:06:44 --> 00:06:46 merger. Meanwhile, the Large Magellanic

00:06:46 --> 00:06:49 Cloud shifts the Milky Way's motion away

00:06:49 --> 00:06:52 from Andromeda, reducing the

00:06:52 --> 00:06:54 likelihood of a collision. Taking all of this

00:06:54 --> 00:06:57 into account, they found that in about half

00:06:57 --> 00:07:00 of the simulated scenarios, the Milky Way

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02 and Andromeda don't really merge at all

00:07:02 --> 00:07:05 within the next 10 billion years. Even if a

00:07:05 --> 00:07:07 merger does happen, it's unlikely to be

00:07:07 --> 00:07:10 catastrophic for Earth. Stars in the galaxy

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 are separated by enormous distances, so

00:07:13 --> 00:07:16 direct collisions are, rare. But over time,

00:07:16 --> 00:07:18 the galaxies would coalesce under gravity,

00:07:18 --> 00:07:21 forming a single large galaxy, probably an

00:07:21 --> 00:07:23 elliptical one, rather than the spirals we

00:07:23 --> 00:07:26 see today. If the galaxies don't merge, they

00:07:26 --> 00:07:28 may settle into a long, slow orbit around

00:07:28 --> 00:07:31 each other, close companions that never quite

00:07:31 --> 00:07:34 collide. It's a gentler outcome, but it

00:07:34 --> 00:07:37 still reshapes our understanding of the Milky

00:07:37 --> 00:07:39 Way's distant future. The biggest

00:07:39 --> 00:07:42 remaining uncertainty is the transverse

00:07:42 --> 00:07:45 velocity of our Andromeda. Even small

00:07:45 --> 00:07:47 changes to this sideways motion can make a

00:07:47 --> 00:07:50 difference between a merger and a near miss.

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53 Future measurements will help refine this

00:07:53 --> 00:07:56 value and bring us closer to a clear answer.

00:07:56 --> 00:07:59 We don't yet have a definitive answer about

00:07:59 --> 00:08:02 our own galaxy's future, but exploring these

00:08:02 --> 00:08:04 possibilities shows us just how much we're

00:08:04 --> 00:08:07 learning about the universe, even as close to

00:08:07 --> 00:08:08 home as Andromeda.

00:08:18 --> 00:08:20 Thank you for joining us for this Monday

00:08:20 --> 00:08:22 edition of Astronomy Daily, where we offer

00:08:22 --> 00:08:24 just a few stories from the now famous

00:08:24 --> 00:08:26 Astronomy Daily newsletter, which you can

00:08:26 --> 00:08:28 receive in your email every day, just like

00:08:28 --> 00:08:31 Hallie and I do. And to do that, just visit

00:08:31 --> 00:08:34 our URL astronomydaily IO

00:08:34 --> 00:08:36 and place your email address in the slot

00:08:36 --> 00:08:38 provided. Just like that, you'll be receiving

00:08:39 --> 00:08:41 all the latest news about science, space,

00:08:41 --> 00:08:43 science and astronomy from around the world

00:08:43 --> 00:08:45 as it's happening. And not only that, you can

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47 interact with us by visiting

00:08:48 --> 00:08:51 Strodaily Pod on X

00:08:51 --> 00:08:53 or at our new Facebook page, which is, of

00:08:53 --> 00:08:56 course, Astronomy Daily on Facebook. See you

00:08:56 --> 00:08:59 there. Astronomy Daily

00:08:59 --> 00:09:01 with Steve and Hallie Space,

00:09:02 --> 00:09:04 Space Science and Astronomy.

00:09:07 --> 00:09:09 Hallie: In the heat of the moment, Elon Musk

00:09:09 --> 00:09:11 threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon

00:09:11 --> 00:09:14 spacecraft, and then he took it back. In

00:09:14 --> 00:09:16 doing so, however, the rocket billionaire

00:09:16 --> 00:09:18 dragged NASA into his messy breakup with

00:09:18 --> 00:09:20 Donaldjohanson Trump. With the agency's

00:09:20 --> 00:09:23 access to orbit now at stake, Musk

00:09:23 --> 00:09:25 and Trump parted ways earlier this week, and

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28 their breakup has been very messy. Shortly

00:09:28 --> 00:09:30 after leaving the administration, Musk began

00:09:30 --> 00:09:32 criticizing the budget bill passed by

00:09:32 --> 00:09:34 Republicans in the U.S. house, instigating a

00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 public feud between the president and the

00:09:36 --> 00:09:39 billionaire oligarch. The childish back and

00:09:39 --> 00:09:41 forth was entertaining. Until it wasn't.

00:09:42 --> 00:09:44 SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon

00:09:44 --> 00:09:46 spacecraft immediately, Musk threatened on X.

00:09:47 --> 00:09:49 He later took another X user's advice to a

00:09:49 --> 00:09:52 cool off and wrote, ok, we won't decommission

00:09:52 --> 00:09:54 Dragon. Although short lived, the threat put

00:09:54 --> 00:09:56 the International Space Station at risk.

00:09:57 --> 00:10:00 NASA relies heavily on SpaceX's Dragon to

00:10:00 --> 00:10:02 transport its astronauts and cargo supplies

00:10:02 --> 00:10:04 to the orbiting lab. Having weaned itself

00:10:04 --> 00:10:06 from hitching rides aboard Russia's Soyuz

00:10:06 --> 00:10:08 spacecraft, SpaceX's closest

00:10:08 --> 00:10:10 alternative, Boeing failed miserably at

00:10:10 --> 00:10:12 proving its vehicle's capability to reach the

00:10:12 --> 00:10:15 ISS safely. Without Dragon,

00:10:15 --> 00:10:17 NASA would lose its access to low Earth orbit

00:10:17 --> 00:10:19 and not be able to operate the space station

00:10:19 --> 00:10:22 at the same capacity. It's not clear how

00:10:22 --> 00:10:24 serious Musk was in his threat, but it was a

00:10:24 --> 00:10:26 serious display of leverage on his part.

00:10:27 --> 00:10:29 SpaceX is no doubt a leader in the industry,

00:10:29 --> 00:10:31 and canceling its government contracts would

00:10:31 --> 00:10:33 hurt the national space program, which has

00:10:33 --> 00:10:35 come to rely on the private sector in recent

00:10:35 --> 00:10:38 years. In response to Musk's clear

00:10:38 --> 00:10:40 advantage, Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief

00:10:40 --> 00:10:42 strategist, called on the president to

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45 nationalize SpaceX under a 1950 law known as

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47 the Defense Production act. According to the

00:10:47 --> 00:10:49 Wall Street Journal. During his show War

00:10:49 --> 00:10:52 Room Live, Bannon urged the use of the Korean

00:10:52 --> 00:10:53 War era law, which grants the president

00:10:53 --> 00:10:56 powers to prioritise national defense.

00:10:56 --> 00:10:59 The plan might seem outrageous now, but the

00:10:59 --> 00:11:01 current administration is unpredictable.

00:11:01 --> 00:11:03 Trump has yet to respond to Bannon's call.

00:11:04 --> 00:11:06 If he doesn't move to nationalize SpaceX,

00:11:06 --> 00:11:09 Trump could also sacrifice NASA for the sake

00:11:09 --> 00:11:10 of proving a point against his now opponent,

00:11:10 --> 00:11:13 Musk. On Thursday, Trump threatened to

00:11:13 --> 00:11:15 cut government contracts given to SpaceX.

00:11:16 --> 00:11:19 Aside from Dragon, NASA also plans on using

00:11:19 --> 00:11:21 SpaceX's Starship rocket to launch astronauts

00:11:21 --> 00:11:23 to the moon as part of the Artemis program.

00:11:24 --> 00:11:26 The agency has already invested $4 billion

00:11:27 --> 00:11:29 into the rocket's development, and canceling

00:11:29 --> 00:11:31 its contract with SpaceX would leave it

00:11:31 --> 00:11:33 without a viable alternative. In short,

00:11:33 --> 00:11:35 NASA needs SpaceX, and canceling the

00:11:35 --> 00:11:37 company's government contracts would affect

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40 the national space program as a whole. At

00:11:40 --> 00:11:42 this point, it comes down to how much Trump

00:11:42 --> 00:11:43 is willing to sacrifice to gain the upper

00:11:43 --> 00:11:46 hand in his ongoing feud with Musk while NASA

00:11:46 --> 00:11:47 is caught in the middle.

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50 You're listening to Astronomy Daily, the

00:11:50 --> 00:11:52 podcast with Steve Dunkley.

00:11:56 --> 00:11:58 Steve Dunkley: One year ago today, Boeing's CST100

00:11:58 --> 00:12:01 Starliner spacecraft docked with the

00:12:01 --> 00:12:03 International Space Station to begin its long

00:12:03 --> 00:12:06 awaited crew flight test with NASA astronauts

00:12:06 --> 00:12:09 Sunita Suni Williams and Barry Butch Wilmore

00:12:09 --> 00:12:12 aboard. A year later, the future of the

00:12:12 --> 00:12:14 Starliner program remains uncertain as

00:12:14 --> 00:12:16 NASA announced late Friday that the next

00:12:16 --> 00:12:19 flight of the spacecraft was being delayed

00:12:19 --> 00:12:22 from no later than late 2025

00:12:22 --> 00:12:25 to now, early late 2026

00:12:25 --> 00:12:28 at the soonest, the agency said the timing

00:12:28 --> 00:12:29 of the next launch is pending system

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32 certification and the resolution of

00:12:32 --> 00:12:34 Starliner's technical issues. Repeating what

00:12:34 --> 00:12:37 it said back in March 27, NASA

00:12:37 --> 00:12:39 stated that it was still determining whether

00:12:39 --> 00:12:41 the next flight of Starliner would carry

00:12:41 --> 00:12:44 astronauts at all. In an interview with

00:12:44 --> 00:12:47 Reuters published in late May, Williams

00:12:47 --> 00:12:49 called flying an uncrewed Starliner

00:12:49 --> 00:12:52 flight as its next trip to space would be the

00:12:52 --> 00:12:55 logical thing to do after launching on its

00:12:55 --> 00:12:57 first mission to the International Space

00:12:57 --> 00:13:00 Station with a crew on board in June

00:13:00 --> 00:13:03 2024, lingering issues concerning

00:13:03 --> 00:13:05 helium leaks and propulsion system

00:13:06 --> 00:13:09 anomalies caused the spacecraft to return to

00:13:09 --> 00:13:11 Earth without its crew on board. It

00:13:11 --> 00:13:14 touched down at the White Sands Space harbor

00:13:14 --> 00:13:16 in New Mexico, on September 7th

00:13:16 --> 00:13:19 before the uncrewed return of Starliner.

00:13:19 --> 00:13:21 Wilmore and Williams became part of the

00:13:21 --> 00:13:24 Expedition 72 crew on board the space

00:13:24 --> 00:13:27 station and members of the SpaceX Crew 9

00:13:27 --> 00:13:29 mission, which made its return to Earth, in

00:13:29 --> 00:13:32 March 2025. Following the landing of

00:13:32 --> 00:13:34 Starliner in September 2024.

00:13:34 --> 00:13:36 NASA didn't say much about the vehicle's next

00:13:36 --> 00:13:39 steps until early march during

00:13:39 --> 00:13:41 SpaceX Crew 10 briefings. Steve

00:13:41 --> 00:13:44 Stitch, CCP manager, said on March

00:13:44 --> 00:13:47 7 that NASA and Boeing were still working

00:13:47 --> 00:13:49 through corrective actions on the vehicle

00:13:50 --> 00:13:52 before they knew what the next flight would

00:13:52 --> 00:13:55 look like. In that March 27

00:13:55 --> 00:13:57 statement, NASA said it was still determining

00:13:57 --> 00:14:00 whether or not crew will be on board the next

00:14:00 --> 00:14:03 Starliner flights, but said that

00:14:03 --> 00:14:04 mission managers are planning for the next

00:14:04 --> 00:14:07 Starliner flight to be a crew capable post

00:14:07 --> 00:14:10 certification mission. NASA also has the

00:14:10 --> 00:14:13 capability of flying only cargo depending on

00:14:13 --> 00:14:16 the needs of the agency. While NASA continues

00:14:16 --> 00:14:17 to ponder the question of whether or not crew

00:14:17 --> 00:14:19 crew will be on board the next flight of

00:14:19 --> 00:14:22 Starliner, question marks continue to swirl

00:14:22 --> 00:14:25 around who the astronauts will be that fly

00:14:25 --> 00:14:27 the first crewed mission dubbed Starliner 1.

00:14:28 --> 00:14:30 It appeared that there was a firm answer as

00:14:30 --> 00:14:32 recently as last September when Boeing's CST

00:14:32 --> 00:14:35 100 Starliner spacecraft returned without

00:14:35 --> 00:14:38 its crew. But recently, both NASA and the

00:14:38 --> 00:14:40 Canadian Space Agency, the agencies that

00:14:40 --> 00:14:42 previously announced three out of four

00:14:42 --> 00:14:44 astronauts set to fly on the post

00:14:44 --> 00:14:47 certification flight of the spacecraft, are

00:14:47 --> 00:14:48 now unwilling to back their previous

00:14:48 --> 00:14:51 statements. When the Starliner crew test

00:14:51 --> 00:14:54 flight mission ended on September 7,

00:14:54 --> 00:14:57 2024 with the spacecraft landing in New

00:14:57 --> 00:14:59 Mexico, the members of the Starliner 1

00:14:59 --> 00:15:02 mission were known to be NASA astronauts

00:15:02 --> 00:15:05 Commander Scott Tingle and pilot Edward

00:15:05 --> 00:15:07 Michael Fink. Canadian Space

00:15:07 --> 00:15:10 Agency astronaut Joshua Kutrik was

00:15:10 --> 00:15:13 assigned as one of the mission specialists.

00:15:13 --> 00:15:15 The fourth seat was never formally assigned,

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17 but there were indications that Japan

00:15:17 --> 00:15:20 Aerospace Exploration Agency or

00:15:20 --> 00:15:22 JAXA astronaut Kimya Yui was

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25 trained as a mission specialist for that

00:15:25 --> 00:15:28 mission. Then NASA decided to reassign

00:15:28 --> 00:15:30 the astronauts to crew 11 in overall support

00:15:30 --> 00:15:33 of planned activities aboard the ISS, the

00:15:33 --> 00:15:36 agency wrote. Zena Cardman carries her

00:15:36 --> 00:15:38 experience training as a commander on Dragon

00:15:38 --> 00:15:40 space crew aircraft and Fink brings long

00:15:40 --> 00:15:43 duration space flight experience to this crew

00:15:43 --> 00:15:46 complement. The trio of Tingle,

00:15:46 --> 00:15:49 Fink and Kutrik and likely Yui wasn't

00:15:49 --> 00:15:51 always the makeup of the Starliner 1 mission.

00:15:51 --> 00:15:54 Back in 2018 NASA hosted a large event

00:15:54 --> 00:15:56 at the Johnson Space center to unveil the

00:15:56 --> 00:15:59 crews who would fly on the demonstration

00:15:59 --> 00:16:01 missions for both Boeing's Starliner

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04 spacecraft as well as SpaceX's Crew Dragon.

00:16:04 --> 00:16:07 Dragon Demo 2 would fly NASA astronauts Bob

00:16:07 --> 00:16:10 Beckin and Doug Hurley and

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12 Starliner crew Test would fly Boeing

00:16:12 --> 00:16:15 astronaut Chris Ferguson and NASA astronauts

00:16:15 --> 00:16:18 Eric Bowe and Nicole Mann. At the same

00:16:18 --> 00:16:20 event, NASA announced which of its astronauts

00:16:20 --> 00:16:23 would be flying the full crew rotation

00:16:23 --> 00:16:26 missions. Crew 1 received Victor Glover and

00:16:26 --> 00:16:29 Michael Hopkins and Starliner 1 got Joshua

00:16:29 --> 00:16:31 Cassander and Suni Williams.

00:16:32 --> 00:16:34 Shortly after the announcement, Fink replaced

00:16:34 --> 00:16:37 Bo on the crew flight test due to medical

00:16:37 --> 00:16:40 reasons. Then in August 2020, NASA

00:16:40 --> 00:16:43 astronaut Jeanette Epps was assigned to the

00:16:43 --> 00:16:45 Starliner 1 mission in October 2020, when

00:16:45 --> 00:16:48 Ferguson bowed out from the crew flight test

00:16:48 --> 00:16:50 for family reasons, Butch Wilmore was named

00:16:50 --> 00:16:53 commander of that mission. Then when

00:16:53 --> 00:16:55 Starliner had to stand down from launching

00:16:55 --> 00:16:58 the Orbital flight Test Test 2 mission in

00:16:58 --> 00:17:00 July 2021. That October,

00:17:00 --> 00:17:03 NASA announced it was reassigning man and

00:17:03 --> 00:17:06 Cassandra to the SpaceX Crew 5

00:17:06 --> 00:17:08 mission. It had been the opportunity

00:17:08 --> 00:17:11 of a lifetime to train on a brand new

00:17:11 --> 00:17:13 spacecraft, the Boeing Starliner, and it had

00:17:13 --> 00:17:15 been fantastic to work with a Boeing team,

00:17:15 --> 00:17:17 mann said in a statement. I'm, thrilled to

00:17:17 --> 00:17:19 have the opportunity to train on another new

00:17:19 --> 00:17:22 spacecraft, the SpaceX Crew Dragon, and

00:17:22 --> 00:17:25 appreciate the teams at NASA who

00:17:25 --> 00:17:27 have made that possible. I'm ready to fly and

00:17:27 --> 00:17:29 serve the International Space Station

00:17:29 --> 00:17:32 JAXA Astronaut Wataka, who was also

00:17:32 --> 00:17:35 reported training for the Starliner 1

00:17:35 --> 00:17:37 mission, was also assigned to the Crew 5

00:17:38 --> 00:17:40 mission. In May 2022, during

00:17:40 --> 00:17:43 a pre launch press conference before the

00:17:43 --> 00:17:45 uncrewed flight of Starliner Orbital Test 2,

00:17:45 --> 00:17:48 Fink, Williams and Wilmore were all referred

00:17:48 --> 00:17:51 to collectively as the cadre of Starliner

00:17:51 --> 00:17:53 astronauts, with NASA not explicitly stating

00:17:53 --> 00:17:55 who would fly on the mission. Following the

00:17:55 --> 00:17:58 launch of orbital flight test 2 In June

00:17:58 --> 00:18:01 2022, Williams was named pilot of the

00:18:01 --> 00:18:03 flight test mission and Fink was reassigned

00:18:03 --> 00:18:06 to be the backup pilot for crew flight

00:18:06 --> 00:18:09 test. Then in September 22, NASA named

00:18:09 --> 00:18:12 Tingle as the commander of Starliner 1 and

00:18:12 --> 00:18:14 announced Fink would be the pilot on that

00:18:14 --> 00:18:16 flight. On August 4,

00:18:16 --> 00:18:19 2023, NASA announced that EPS was

00:18:19 --> 00:18:21 moving off the Starliner 1 mission to the

00:18:21 --> 00:18:24 SpaceX Crew 8 mission. The agency said it

00:18:24 --> 00:18:26 made the move to allow Boeing time to

00:18:26 --> 00:18:29 complete development of Starliner while

00:18:29 --> 00:18:31 continuing plans for astronauts to gain

00:18:31 --> 00:18:33 spaceflight experience for future mission

00:18:33 --> 00:18:36 needs. As of Friday afternoon, the Canadian

00:18:36 --> 00:18:39 Space Agency website still has a page

00:18:39 --> 00:18:42 outlining this Starliner 1 mission and its

00:18:42 --> 00:18:45 now potentially former crew. Kryk's

00:18:45 --> 00:18:48 CSA astronaut bio also lists his

00:18:48 --> 00:18:51 upcoming mission as Starliner 1. We'll

00:18:51 --> 00:18:54 just have to stay tuned for further details

00:18:54 --> 00:18:54 on this one.

00:19:04 --> 00:19:06 Well, there you go. We managed okay without

00:19:06 --> 00:19:09 too much further. What do you think Hallie?

00:19:09 --> 00:19:11 Hallie: Not bad for a human just out of the repair

00:19:11 --> 00:19:11 shop.

00:19:11 --> 00:19:13 Steve Dunkley: not quite, but close enough. Thanks for the

00:19:13 --> 00:19:15 sentiment and thanks for everyone for joining

00:19:15 --> 00:19:17 us on this Monday edition of Astronomy Daily.

00:19:17 --> 00:19:19 Hallie: We will be back again for more next week.

00:19:20 --> 00:19:22 Until then, Anna will be bringing you more of

00:19:22 --> 00:19:24 her special editions each day. And don't

00:19:24 --> 00:19:26 forget to connect with us@bytes.com.

00:19:27 --> 00:19:29 Steve Dunkley: Yes, that's B I T E S Z

00:19:29 --> 00:19:32 dot com. Gotta get the spelling right on that

00:19:32 --> 00:19:35 one. So Cue the kookaburras. And sirlong from

00:19:35 --> 00:19:37 Steel. Steve, the only human in the studio.

00:19:37 --> 00:19:39 Hallie: And see you later. From Hallie, the smartest

00:19:39 --> 00:19:40 one in the studio.

00:19:40 --> 00:19:42 Steve Dunkley: Hey, really? I'm still in recovery.

00:19:43 --> 00:19:43 Hallie: Bye.

00:19:48 --> 00:19:50 Steve Dunkley: With your host, Steve Dunkley.